Talk:3rd millennium

Birthdays and Wills

There seems to be an ongoing slow-motion edit war about whether to include in the list the "1,000-something" birthday of ancient figures, and whether to include the scheduled release dates of the wills of various people, including members of the Royal Family. Personally, I think that this is WP:TRIVIA that doesn't need to be mentioned, but the Royal Family Wills does have a citation behind it (the other stuff doesn't), and I'm preemptively bringing this here (and will also request temporary page protection as all warring parties are already confirmed) for further discussion. I take no position on the content myself. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 17:54, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

Content is just vandalism. Take the first item, 2217: The will Bella Bond is scheduled to become public knowledge, like a two year old murder victim has a will. Same for 2904: The will Dean Shillingsworth is scheduled to become public knowledge, same applies with the additional caveat of 900 years being preposterous. FDW777 (talk) 18:14, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

Yikes... I didn't notice those two. Definitely not a good look. Though at least some of the disputed content was/is definitely plausible like the tidbits about the Royal Family and something or another concerning a time capsule. So it's not obvious vandalism, even if parts of the content are implausible. Thus even if I had noticed the two questionable entries I would probably have still treated it as routine edit-warring to be safe. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 21:15, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:2101 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 12:26, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:2067 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 22:06, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:2300 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 01:15, 13 December 2025 (UTC)

2040s

As it is now only 14 years away can we give the 2040s its own article? PatGallacher (talk) 18:06, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

27th century

Could somebody add something like this?: c. 2600: Due to Earth's axial precession the point of March equinox will move from the constellation of Pisces to that of Aquarius, according to the official constellation boundaries defined by the International Astronomical Union in 1929.

2061 event

I believe the fortune of Halley's commit in August of 2061 should be added to this list. ~2026-25567-40 (talk) 16:02, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

2100 etc.

2100 is the end of the 21st century, not the beginning of the 22nd. In general: 100x is the end of the xth century, not the beginning of the x+1st. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 14:01, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

How many of these "predictions" are actually plausible and which are just baseless speculation ?

I belive that many of these topics are things that are highly unlikely to happen. We also need to have serious discussion on what should be included in the list and what shouldn't. ~2026-27869-71 (talk) 09:37, 9 May 2026 (UTC)

To add on;I dont think the long player deserves a mention. ~2026-27869-71 (talk) 09:39, 9 May 2026 (UTC)

"2637" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect 2637 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 May 31 § 2637 until a consensus is reached. Renerpho (talk) 13:53, 31 May 2026 (UTC)