E.K. v. Department of Defense Education Activity
E.K. v. Department of Defense Education Activity is a case pending in the U.S District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia brought by the American Civil Liberties Union, ACLU of Virginia, and ACLU of Kentucky against the Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA). The complaint claims that Trump's Executive Orders 14168, 14185, and 14190 violate the First Amendment on their face and in the way they are being used by defendants. The executive orders aim to remove gender ideology, DEI, and critical race theory and aim to remove them from schools. The case specifically relates to the application in military schools of Executive Order 14190, titled "Ending Radical Indoctrination in K-12 Schooling".[1][2][3][4][5]
History
[edit]On April 15, 2025, the lawsuit was filed and claimed that multiple books based on civil rights—To Kill a Mockingbird, Fahrenheit 451, and Well-Read Black Girl—have been banned because of the executive orders. The First Amendment claims rely on the Supreme Court case Island Trees School District v. Pico (1982).[1][3] The judge for the case is Patricia Tolliver Giles.[2][3]
On October 20, Judge Giles granted a prelimenary injunction, ordering the removed books be reinstated and enjoining DoDEA from further book removals.[6]
References
[edit]- ^ a b Complaint E.K v. Department of Defense Education Activity
- ^ a b E.K. v. Department of Defense Education Activity, 1:25-cv-00637 – CourtListener.com
- ^ a b c 'Whitewashing' the curriculum: ACLU takes aim at Department of Defense schools • Virginia Mercury
- ^ A.C.L.U. Sues Defense Department Schools Over Book Bans - The New York Times
- ^ Students sue Defense Department over book bans in military schools
- ^ op de Beeck, Nathalie (2025-10-21). "Virginia District Judge Orders DoDEA to Restore School Books". Publishers Weekly. Archived from the original on 2025-10-21. Retrieved 2026-04-29.