This site uses cookies, tags, and tracking settings to store information that help give you the very best browsing experience. Dismiss this warning

Learning to Teach Hard Mathematics: Do Novice Teachers and Their Instructors Give up Too Easily?

Author:
Hilda Borko University of Colorado

Search for other papers by Hilda Borko in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Margaret Eisenhart University of Colorado

Search for other papers by Margaret Eisenhart in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Catherine A. Brown Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Search for other papers by Catherine A. Brown in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Robert G. Underhill Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Search for other papers by Robert G. Underhill in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Doug Jones University of Kentucky

Search for other papers by Doug Jones in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Patricia C. Agard Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Search for other papers by Patricia C. Agard in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

This article analyzes from several vantage points a classroom lesson in which a student teacher was unsuccessful in providing a conceptually based justification for the standard division-of-fractions algorithm. We attempt to understand why the lesson failed, what it reveals about learning to teach, and what the implications are for mathematics teacher education. We focus on (a) the student teacher's beliefs about good mathematics teaching, her knowledge related to division of fractions, and her beliefs about learning to teach; and (b) the treatment of division of fractions in the mathematics methods course she took. The student teacher's conception of good mathematics teaching included components compatible with current views of effective mathematics teaching. However, these beliefs are difficult to achieve without a stronger conceptual knowledge base and a greater commitment to use available resources and to engage in hard thinking than she possessed. Further, the mathematics methods course did not require the student teacher to reconsider her knowledge base, to confront the contradictions between her knowledge base and at least some of her beliefs, or to reassess her beliefs about how she would learn to teach. These findings suggest that mathematics teacher education programs should reconsider how they provide subject matter knowledge and opportunities to teach it, and whether and how they challenge student teachers' existing beliefs.

Contributor Notes

Htlda Borko, Associate Professor, School of Education, Campus Box 249, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0249

Margaret Eisenhart. Associate Professor. School of Education, Campus Box 249. University of Colorado, Boulder. CO 80309-0249

Catherine A. Brown, Associate Professor, Division of Curriculum and instruction, College of Education, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061

Robert G. Underhill, Professor, Division of Curriculum and Instruction, College of Education. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061

Doug Jones. Assistant Professor, Department of Curriculum and Instruction. College of Education, University of Kentucky. Lexington, KY 40506-0017

Patricia C. Agard, Graduate Student, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 9 Sherman Avenue. Fort Thomas, KY 41075

Journal for Research in Mathematics Education
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 3812 0 0
Full Text Views 263 180 14
PDF Downloads 261 163 4
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0