Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Saved research
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  3. Article

Testing beyond words: Using tests to enhance visuospatial map learning

  • Brief Reports
  • Published: June 2007
  • Volume 14, pages 474–478 (2007)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF
Save article
View saved research
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Testing beyond words: Using tests to enhance visuospatial map learning
Download PDF
  • Shana K. Carpenter1 &
  • Harold Pashler1 
  • 3119 Accesses

  • 125 Citations

  • 3 Altmetric

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

Psychological research shows that learning can be powerfully enhanced through testing, but this finding has so far been confined to memory tasks requiring verbal responses. We explored whether testing can enhance learning of visuospatial information in maps. Fifty subjects each studied two maps, one through conventional study, and the other through computer-prompted tests. For the tests, the subjects were repeatedly presented with the same map with one feature deleted (e.g., a road or a river), and they tried to covertly recall the missing feature and its location. Subjects’ map drawings after 30 min were significantly better for maps learned through tests in comparison with maps learned through the same amount of time devoted to conventional study. These results suggest that the testing effect is not limited to the types of memory that require discrete, verbal responses, and that utilizing covert retrievals may allow the effect to be extended to a variety of complex, nonverbal learning tasks.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • Brain Mapping
  • Cognition
  • Educational Research
  • Learning Psychology
  • Psychological Testing
  • Assessment and Testing

References

  • Allen, G. A., Mahler, W. A., &Estes, W. K. (1969). Effects of recall tests on long-term retention of paired associates.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,8, 463–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, R. C. (1972). Ingredients for a theory of instruction.American Psychologist,27, 921–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjork, R. A. (1988). Retrieval practice and the maintenance of knowledge. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.),Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues. Vol. 1: Memory in everyday life (pp. 396–401). Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, S. K., &DeLosh, E. L. (2005). Application of the testing and spacing effects to name learning.Applied Cognitive Psychology,19, 619–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, S. K., &DeLosh, E. L. (2006). Impoverished cue support enhances subsequent retention: Support for the elaborative retrieval explanation of the testing effect.Memory & Cognition,34, 268–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, S. K., Pashler, H., &Vul, E. (2006). What types of learning are enhanced by a cued recall test?Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,13, 826–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, S. K., Pashler, H., Wixted, J. T., & Vul, E. (2007).The effects of tests on learning and forgetting. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Carrier, M., &Pashler, H. (1992). The influence of retrieval on retention.Memory & Cognition,20, 633–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cull, W. L. (2000). Untangling the benefits of multiple study opportunities and repeated testing for cued recall.Applied Cognitive Psychology,14, 215–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, F. N. (1989). Spacing effects and their implications for theory and practice.Educational Psychology Review,4, 309–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, F. N. (1996). Distributing and managing the conditions of encoding and practice. In E. L. Bjork & R. A. Bjork (Eds.),Handbook of perception and cognition: Memory (pp. 317–344). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Druckman, D., &Bjork, R. A. (EDS.) (1991).In the mind’s eye: Enhancing human performance. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Druckman, D., &Bjork, R. A. (EDS.) (1994).Learning, remembering, believing: Enhancing human performance. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover, J. A. (1989). The “testing” phenomenon: Not gone but nearly forgotten.Journal of Educational Psychology,81, 392–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healy, A. F., King, C. L., &Sinclair, G. P. (1997). Maintenance of knowledge about temporal, spatial, and item information: Memory for course schedules and word lists. In D. G. Payne & F. G. Conrad (Eds.),Intersections in basic and applied memory research (pp. 215–230). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Izawa, C. (1992). Test trials contributions to optimization of learning processes: Study/test trials interactions. In A. F. Healy, S. M. Kosslyn, & R. M. Shiffrin (Eds.),Essays in honor of William K. Estes: Vol. 2. From learning processes to cognitive processes (pp. 1–33). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, T. M., &Hirshman, E. (1996). Investigations of the testing effect.American Journal of Psychology,109, 451–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lachman, R., &Laughery, K. R. (1968). Is a test trial a training trial in free recall learning?Journal of Experimental Psychology,76, 40–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landauer, T. K., &Bjork, R. A. (1978). Optimum rehearsal patterns and name learning. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.),Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues. Vol. 2: Clinical and educational implications (pp. 625–632). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, M. A., &Einstein, G. O. (2005). Material appropriate difficulty: A framework for determining when difficulty is desirable for improving learning. In A. F. Healy (Ed.),Experimental cognitive psychology and its applications (pp. 73–85). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, M. A., &Fisher, R. P. (1991). Tests and test feedback as learning sources.Contemporary Educational Psychology,16, 192–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mozer, M. C., Howe, M., &Pashler, H. (2004). Using testing to enhance learning: A comparison of two hypotheses. In K. Forbus, D. Gentner, & T. Reiger (Eds.),Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 975–980). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nungester, R. J., &Duchastel, P. C. (1982). Testing versus review: Effects on retention.Journal of Educational Psychology,74, 18–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roediger, H. L., III, &Karpicke, J. D. (2006a). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention.Psychological Science,17, 249–255.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roediger, H. L., III, &Karpicke, J. D. (2006b). The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice.Perspectives on Psychological Science,1, 181–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roediger, H. L., III, &Marsh, E. J. (2005). The positive and negative consequences of multiple-choice testing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,31, 1155–1159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runquist, W. N. (1983). Some effects of remembering on forgetting.Memory & Cognition,11, 641–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, M. A., Ewers, M., &Buonanno, J. F. (2003). Different rates of forgetting following study versus test trials.Memory,11, 571–580.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, M. A., &Roediger, H. L., III (1992). Disparate effects of repeated testing: Reconciling Ballard’s (1913) and Bartlett’s (1932) results.Psychological Science,3, 240–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitten, W. B., &Bjork, R. A. (1977). Learning from tests: Effects of spacing.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,16, 465–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittman, W. T., &Healy, A. F. (1995). A long-term retention advantage for spatial information learned naturally and in the laboratory. In A. F. Healy & L. E. Bourne, Jr. (Eds.),Learning and memory of knowledge and skills: Durability and specificity (pp. 170–205). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, 0109, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, 92093-0109, La Jolla, CA

    Shana K. Carpenter & Harold Pashler

Authors
  1. Shana K. Carpenter
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Harold Pashler
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shana K. Carpenter.

Additional information

This work was supported by the Institute of Education Sciences (Grant R305H040108 from the U.S. Department of Education) and the National Institute of Mental Health (Grant R01-MH61549 to H.P.).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carpenter, S.K., Pashler, H. Testing beyond words: Using tests to enhance visuospatial map learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 14, 474–478 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194092

Download citation

  • Received: 17 April 2006

  • Accepted: 19 July 2006

  • Issue date: June 2007

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194092

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Test Trial
  • Verbal Response
  • Testing Effect
  • Retrieval Practice
  • Visuospatial Task

Profiles

  1. Shana K. Carpenter View author profile

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Footer Navigation

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z
  • Subjects A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Language editing
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover

Corporate Navigation

  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

104.23.197.170

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature