Abstract
Afrotheria, the superorder that includes aardvarks, elephants, elephant shrews, hyraxes, manatees, and tenrecs, is home to some of the most charismatic and well-studied animals on Earth. Here, we assemble a nearly taxonomically complete molecular timetree of Afrotheria using an integrative approach that combines a literature search for published timetrees, de novo dating of untimed molecular phylogenies, and inference of timetrees from new alignments. The resulting timetree sheds light on the impact of the Cretaceous-Paleogene (K-Pg) role ∼66 million years ago in the diversification of Afrotherian orders. The earliest divergence in the timetree of Afrotherian mammals predates the K-Pg event by 12 million years, followed by five interordinal divergences that occurred gradually over a 16-million-year period encompassing the K-Pg event.
Introduction
Six mammalian orders, containing some of the most charismatic species on Earth, such as elephants and manatees, share an evolutionary history that originated in Africa (). The elephants and mammoths (order Proboscidea), manatees and relatives (order Sirenia), aardvarks (order Tubulidentata), tenrecs and relatives (order Afrosoricida), hyraxes (order Hyracoidea), and elephant shrews (order Macroscelidea) together comprise Afrotheria, a clade supported by robust molecular phylogenies (; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; Yazhini et al., 2021; ) and biogeographic data (; Wildman et al., 2007; ).
Africa was essentially an island from the end of the early Cretaceous to the mid-Eocene (105–40 mya) (), following its separation from South America and before establishing connections with Eurasia. During this time, Afrotherian mammals diversified to fill many ecological niches occupied by other orders of mammals on other continents (; ) before gradually spreading outward (). For example, golden moles (Afrosoricida) are anatomically and ecologically similar to true moles (Eulipotyphla: Talpidae), and elephant shrews (Macroscelidea) are similar to the nearly globally distributed shrews (Eulipotyphla: Soricidae).
However, while the phylogenetic and biogeographic signals are clear, the precise timing of the origins of all the members of Afrotherian orders remains unclear. The fossil record has been interpreted to suggest a 66 million-year divergence time between the majority of mammal orders, shortly after the Cretaceous–Paleogene (K-Pg) boundary, which marked the extinction of non-avian dinosaurs (Williamson et al., 2014). In this interpretation, the abundance of new mammal forms in the fossil record can be read to suggest an adaptive radiation into vacated niche space, which gave rise to modern mammal lineages, among them the Afrotherian orders (; ; ). However, molecular phylogenetic dating has converged on a median date of ∼90 mya for many mammalian superordinal divergences, which is 30 million years older than the oldest fossils would suggest (; ; ; ; ; ). In light of these results, continental breakup has been invoked as the primary driver of major lineage divergences for placental mammals (; ).
Given their fundamental relationship to plate tectonics and geodispersal, the Afrotheria represent a compelling opportunity to test the hypothesis of radiation with a natural control for continental drift. Given that the six Afrotherian orders originated on an isolated continent, continental drift cannot have played a role at the ordinal level, and thus we have only to determine the timing of the major splits within Afrotheria to determine whether they occurred in rapid succession post-K-Pg, which would support the theory of rapid radiation, or whether there was a protracted period between the first and last ordinal split, with some divergences occurring before the K-Pg, which would fail to support this hypothesis. In other words, Afrotheria gives us a natural experiment to test whether the K-Pg impact can be invoked as a primary driver of diversification.
However, testing hypotheses on the basis of divergence times derived from incomplete phylogenies can lead to unreliable results (; ). Fortunately, it has been shown that nearly taxonomically complete phylogenies can often be assembled from existing published phylogenetic hypotheses without substantially acquiring new data (; ), thereby allowing for robust hypothesis testing without the need for resource-intensive new data collection. To build a nearly complete Afrotherian tree, we followed a three-step protocol () resulting in a phylogeny of Afrotheria with 86 species, 100% of the extant species-level taxa recognized in the NCBI taxonomy database (). The NCBI taxonomy database only includes species that are in sequence databases. Our approach entailed: first, a literature search for timed molecular phylogenies; second, a search for molecular phylogenies with branch lengths proportional to genetic distance, for which we could impose chronological constraints; and finally, the assembly of novel sequence alignments from public data and de novo timetree construction. This protocol not only represents a flexible, resource-light approach that can be carried out for other taxa without the need for substantial new funding, field work, or laboratory work, but also a valuable way to leverage data that are otherwise trapped in static, published phylogenetic trees toward answering compelling evolutionary questions.
Results
The timetree of Afrotheria
The NCBI taxonomy database includes 86 species-level Afrotherian taxa with full binomial names. This number was obtained by excluding the following extinct members: four mammoths (Mammuthus columbi, M. exilis, M. jeffersonii, and M. primigenius), the North American mastodon (Mammut americanum), the Stellar’s sea cow (Hydrodamalis gigas), two elephants (Elephas antiquus and E. cypriotes), and the elephant relative Notiomastodon platensis (). Of these 86 species, 79 are present in the fifth edition of the TimeTree database (TT5) (). This leaves seven species for which molecular and possibly phylogenetic data exist; however, they have not been integrated into a comprehensive phylogenetic hypothesis: two golden moles (Amblysomus robustus and Cryptochloris zyli), the Benin tree hyrax (Dendrohyrax interfluvialis), the Karoo rock elephant shrew (Elephantulus pilicaudus), two additional elephant shrews (Macroscelides flavicaudatus and M. micus), and Dobson’s shrew tenrec (Nesogale dobsoni).
We conducted a multifaceted literature search for these seven missing Afrotherian species to find publications containing pertinent phylogenetic trees. We checked the source studies that contributed molecular data to GenBank for these species and then, if no tree was available, we searched Google Scholar for any timed molecular phylogenies that included them. Priority was given to phylogenies where divergence times were estimated by their respective authors (timetrees). This yielded five published phylogenies containing six species (; ; ). Two of the phylogenies were timed (; ), and three were untimed (; ; ). This left only the Benin tree hyrax (Dendrohyrax interfluvialis) unrepresented.
For Dendrohyrax interfluvialis, we accessed a sequence for cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (CO1), which is commonly used for species identification and phylogenetics, from GenBank (QZR93760.1) and subjected it to an NCBI GCR smartBLAST analysis, which identified GenBank accessions for homologous markers from related species and outgroup taxa (the species lists are included in the Methodological Details). We visually inspected the alignment in MEGA () and then built a phylogeny in MEGA and timed it using RelTime (). The accession list, alignment file, and intermediary tree files are available in the Supplementary Material.
In the case of every published tree we found, we observed that the final Newick tree files were not made available with their respective publications, making it difficult to integrate these phylogenetic hypotheses with downstream macroevolutionary projects such as ours. We manually created Newick tree files by faithfully tracing the figures presented in each manuscript, thereby preserving the topology and branch lengths (timed or untimed) estimated by the original authors. We did so by capturing the topology in the manual tree editor in MEGA 12 () and carefully determined the branch lengths using ImageJ (). We then visually inspected each of our Newick trees and corrected any discrepancies with the source by manually editing the resulting Newick string in a rich text editor to ensure accurate reproduction of the published tree figure. This step is essential to resurrect valuable contributions that are essentially frozen out of modern, bioinformatic-scale evolutionary studies. These tree files are available in the Supplementary Material.
For the three phylogenies that had not been timed by their original authors (; ; ), we imposed literature-consensus calibrations in the RelTime analysis (; ) following our secondary calibration protocol (; ) in order to convert the branch lengths from units of genetic distance to absolute time. The timed tree files are available in the Supplementary Material. This protocol benefits from using the corpus of divergence time estimates synthesized by the TimeTree of Life database to constrain divergences that would otherwise lack pertinent or unambiguous fossil calibrations (; ).
Finally, we used Chrono-STA () to synthesize all the timetrees, including the TT5 backbone, published timetrees (; ), three newly timed phylogenies (; ; ), and our novel timetree for Dendrohyrax interfluvialis. This yielded a final super-timetree of Afrotheria, in which every tip and node age is informed by molecular data (Figure 1). It incorporates 86 species (Figure 2), representing 100% of all extant Afrotherians in the NCBI taxonomic database.
FIGURE 1
FIGURE 2
We observed the crown age of Afrotheria to be 79.0 mya, which is approximately 12 million years prior to the K-Pg boundary (66 mya) (Figure 1). Similarly, the split between Tubulidentata and the clade comprising Afrosoricida and Macroscelidea occurred at 72.4 mya, and the split between Afrosoricida and Macroscelidea occurred at 67.5 mya. The splits between the remaining three orders are younger than the K-Pg. We estimated that Hyracoidea and Sirenia split 60.7 mya, and these two split from Proboscidea 60.9 mya, while Afrosoricida split from Macroscelidea 62.4 mya. In other words, the deepest splits within Afrotheria occurred prior to the K-Pg event, while the younger half of the ordinal splits occurred shortly thereafter. This represents a span of 18.3 million years from the beginning to the end of Afrotherian ordinal diversification.
Discussion
We assembled a molecular phylogeny of 86 Afrotherian species through the synthesis of published timed phylogenies, untimed phylogenies, and molecular sequences. Such large-scale, nearly complete phylogenies are still relatively rare in the field, even for exceptionally well-studied groups (), but they are highly valuable for downstream work in evolutionary biology and conservation.
For example, this new tree allowed us to assess the impact of the K-Pg event on ordinal diversification within Afrotheria. We found that the basal split occurred at 79.0 mya, prior to the K-Pg, which is consistent with several other pre-K-Pg estimates (; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ). Similarly, the second split, between aardvarks (Tubulidentata) and the clade comprised of tenrecs (Afrosoricida) and elephant shrews (Macroscelidea), occurred at 72.4 mya, which is consistent with several previously reported dates (; ; ). Furthermore, the subsequent divergence between tenrecs and elephant shrews occurred at 67.5 mya in our tree, which is also consistent with prior work (; ). Crucially, Afrotherian ordinal splits span 18.3 million years from the first to the last intra-ordinal divergence, or approximately 20% of the total age of the clade. Thus, the ordinal divergences within Afrotheria began prior to the K-Pg event and spanned a substantial portion of the history of the clade, which cannot be interpreted as evidence supporting a rapid, post-K-Pg radiation of Afrotherian orders.
In contrast, some prior studies found a post-K-Pg timing for the basal Afrotherian divergence, for example, at 65.4 mya and at 64.9 mya. This is likely attributable to the use of restrictive time calibrations (). imposed 16 calibrations on a tree of only 65 taxa, including a crown-Afrotherian calibration centered at 60 mya. imposed a broad set of fossil calibrations drawn from 25 separate publications on a tree with 95 taxa, but their position and ranges are not explicitly stated. In other words, both studies temporally constrained at least a quarter of the internal nodes in their trees. Importantly, these two cases reflect a minority position, as the other 22 studies in the TimeTree database estimated the crown-Afrotherian divergence to have occurred 70 mya or earlier, which is decisively pre-K-Pg. Thus, the present work demonstrates the value of large-scale syntheses in determining consensus timing for major divergences across the tree of life.
Finally, the tree we assembled here represents a useful synthesis of decades of work in Afrotherian phylogenetics. We hope it can serve as a blueprint for future large-scale synthetic molecular trees of other well-studied groups.
Methodological details
Taxonomic reference
We used the NCBI taxonomy database () as a taxonomic framework. We identified 86 binomial taxa, excluding all extinct species (e.g., mammoths), taxa of uncertain taxonomic identity (indicated by an ICZN abbreviation, such as “sp.”), hybrids, redundant subspecies (retaining the type ssp. if no binomial name is recognized), and regional variants. After this careful curation, our target species list for literature searches included 86 Afrotherians.
It should be noted that some minor taxonomic disagreements exist in Afrotherian taxonomy. The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List recognizes a total of 88 Afrotherian species compared to 86 in the NCBI. Calcochloris tytonis, Chrysochloris visagiei, Dendrohyrax validus, and Hydrodamalis gigas are present in the IUCN Red List but not in the NCBI, while Dendrohyrax interfluvialis and Rhynchocyon stuhlmanni are present in the NCBI but not in the IUCN. Furthermore, the NCBI has the names Huetia leucorhinus and Limnogale mergulus, while the IUCN Red List uses the synonyms Huetia leucorhina and Microgale mergulus. It is outside the scope of this article to carry out a full taxonomic revision of these clades. Because renaming several tip taxa would have little bearing on our final phylogenetic hypothesis, we will defer to the NCBI throughout.
Phylogeny processing
We captured the phylogenies as Newick strings from published image files of five studies by manually constructing the topology in MEGA version 12 (), then measuring and reproducing branch lengths in ImageJ 1.53k (). Branch lengths were converted from measured lengths to pixels to either millions of years for timed trees or molecular substitutions for untimed trees using the provided scale bars. To determine if we could accurately reproduce a phylogeny as a Newick file from an image embedded in a publication PDF, we first generated an example tree, saved it as a 300 DPI JPEG image, and created a Newick file 10 times, then observed the range of times produced for each node. We found that on average, node heights were estimated within approximately 1 million years of the true times we used to build the initial tree. We deemed this minor degree of imprecision sufficient for our purposes in distance-based phylogeny synthesis, while acknowledging that any uncertainty in time estimates reported in the associated publications was always greater. These trees are present in the Supplementary Material as “raw trees.”
In cases where figures in publications contained tips with labels that did not appear in the NCBI taxonomic reference, these tips were pruned prior to super-timetree inference. Such discrepancies typically stem from taxonomic discord. For example, included the tip label “Kilimatalpa stuhlmanni,” whereas the NCBI taxonomy lacks this name but did have “Chrysochloris stuhlmanni.” In cases like this, identifying synonymy and merging the two names is simple, but in others, it would require a degree of domain-specific taxonomic expertise that is outside the scope of the present work. Rather than attempting to reconcile the names present in every study with both the NCBI taxonomy and the TimeTree database, we maintained the NCBI as our sole reference, simply dropping any tips that did not appear therein. Furthermore, we removed tips with redundant labels (e.g., multiple members of the same species), as these were unnecessary for our primary goal of integrating new species into the TimeTree backbone. Similarly, if a study tree had multiple species that were already present in the backbone, these could be dropped, as the Chrono-STA approach used for super-timetree construction was developed specifically for merging timetrees on the basis of minimal taxonomic overlap. In fact, only a single tip needs to be shared between a study tree and the backbone for them to be merged seamlessly; therefore, pruning redundant tips in the study trees did not impact our ability to integrate the new species.
Similarly, when study trees contained tips that were not resolved to the species level [for example, , who used single tips labeled “Elephant” and “Hyrax” in their tree as placeholders for their respective clades], we used species-level representative taxa (Elephas maximus and Dendrohyrax dorsalis) in their place. This was possible because, by phylogenetic first principles, any two members of a single clade are equidistant from their sister clade. In other words, all elephants share the same divergence time from all hyraxes or any other Afrotherian. Using a representative elephant here facilitates super-timetree construction with Chrono-STA by increasing taxonomic overlap, but, crucially, unlike the case with renamed taxa, this does not risk any taxonomic confusion because all members of the given group are phylogenetically equal in this context. This becomes especially clear when considering that Chrono-STA is a distance-based method that is wholly agnostic of topology.
Thus, where differences between the published versions of the trees and the ones we used in our analysis do exist, typically in the form of taxa that were dropped, and in a few cases due to the choice of representative taxa used to replace compressed clades, we made these modifications to facilitate super-timetree inference and minimize any potential bias induced due to taxonomic discord. Crucially, because we used a super-timetree approach developed specifically for reconciling sparsely sampled timetrees, we can be sure that taking the conservative step of pruning contested or redundant tips does not negatively impact our final super-timetree. Pruned trees and those with representative taxa are present in the Supplementary Material as “final trees,” and these were the exact files used in super-timetree inference.
We timed the three untimed trees using a literature consensus secondary calibration approach developed in previous work (; ). We constructed a relative timetree using RelTime (; ) in MEGA (), then selected a basal divergence to calibrate and estimated divergence times for all ingroup species. We accessed a distribution of published divergence times from the TimeTree database in each case. We used TT5’s reported 95% CI of published time estimates to define a uniform confidence interval imposed on the selected node. These newly-timed phylogenies are also present in the Supplementary Material as “final trees”, whereas their untimed equivalents are “raw trees.”
Novel phylogeny building
We found that Dendrohyrax interfluvialis had available molecular data in GenBank, but we did not find a published molecular phylogeny that contained this taxon. Therefore, we searched GenBank accessions for D. interfluvialis to identify any record of a mitochondrial protein greater than 100 amino acids in length. This would form the basis of a simple molecular phylogeny from which we could extract relevant divergence times.
We selected a mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I protein sequence (QZR93760.1) and submitted it to NIH CGR SmartBLAST to find protein homologs. We then selected several closely related members of Hyracoidea as ingroup taxa (Crossarchus obscurus, Dendrohyrax dorsalis, Heterohyrax brucei, and Procavia capensis), plus several reference organisms as outgroups (Mus musculus, Homo sapiens, Danio rerio, Drosophila melanogaster, and Caenorhabditis elegans). We exported these sequences to a FASTA file using GenPept, aligned and trimmed excess sequences from the ends where necessary, and built a molecular phylogeny in MEGA () using a maximum likelihood search via nearest-neighbor interchange (NNI) for each under the JTT model. We used adaptive bootstraps () with an adaptive parameter search to test the confidence of our topology. We then timed this tree in RelTime (; ) as described above. The accession list, alignment, and tree files are available in the Supplementary Material.
Chrono-STA
To combine all timetrees, we ran the supertree unification algorithm Chrono-STA (). We used the first revised weighted approach implemented in Chrono-STA, which is publicly available on their GitHub repository: https://github.com/josebarbamontoya/chrono-sta. The final phylogeny, with all tip labels shown for clarity, can be seen in Figure 2. Importantly, Chrono-STA was developed specifically to overcome sparse taxonomic sampling and high variance among different time estimates of the same phylogenetic divergence on the basis of the shared chronological scale. Phylogenies are converted to patristic pairwise time matrices, rendering the method topology-agnostic. Then, a modified recursive UPGMA algorithm is applied to integrate multiple small phylogenies into a single, comprehensive distance matrix with no gaps. For this reason, including redundant tips, such as those present in the TT5 backbone, is superfluous. This allowed us to prune them as needed to minimize error stemming from taxonomic flux.
To capture the charismatic extinct Proboscidean lineages (mammoths and mastodons), we subsequently accessed a phylogeny of Proboscidea from TT5, which included extinct taxa supported by the publication . We then ran Chrono-STA to merge our consensus phylogeny with this Proboscidean phylogeny, resulting in a tree with the additional species Paleoloxodon antiquus, Mammuthus primigenius, Mammut americanum, and Losodokodon losodokinus. These are of great interest to some researchers, but as extinct species, they fall outside the scope of this project. We included the phylogeny of these species in the Supplementary Material.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
JC: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. WF: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. AT: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. SH: Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. SK: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing.
Funding
The authors declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (GM139540-05) and the National Science Foundation (DBI 2318917).
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Michael Suleski for technical support with the use of the TimeTree database.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Generative AI statement
The authors declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbinf.2025.1710926/full#supplementary-material
References
1
ArnasonU.JankeA. (2002). Mitogenomic analyses of eutherian relationships. Cytogenet. Genome Res.96, 20–32. 10.1159/000063023
2
Barba-MontoyaJ.CraigJ. M.KumarS. (2025). Integrating phylogenies with chronology to assemble the tree of life. Front. Bioinform5, 1571568. 10.3389/fbinf.2025.1571568
3
BronnerG. N.MynhardtS.BennettN. C.CohenL.CrumptonN.HofreiterM.et al (2024). Phylogenetic history of golden moles and tenrecs (Mammalia: Afrotheria). Zool. J. Linn. Soc.201, 184–213. 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlad121
4
CarlisleE.JanisC. M.PisaniD.DonoghueP. C. J.SilvestroD. (2023). A timescale for placental mammal diversification based on Bayesian modeling of the fossil record. Curr. Biol.33, 3073–3082.e3. 10.1016/j.cub.2023.06.016
5
CraigJ. M.BambaG. L.Barba-MontoyaJ.HedgesS. B.KumarS. (2023a). Completing a molecular timetree of apes and monkeys. Front. Bioinform3, 1284744. 10.3389/fbinf.2023.1284744
6
CraigJ. M.KumarS.HedgesS. B. (2023b). The origin of eukaryotes and rise in complexity were synchronous with the rise in oxygen. Front. Bioinforma.3, 1233281. 10.3389/fbinf.2023.1233281
7
CraigJ. M.HedgesS. B.KumarS. (2024). Completing a molecular timetree of primates. Front. Bioinform4, 1495417. 10.3389/fbinf.2024.1495417
8
DouadyC. J.DouzeryE. J. P. (2003). Molecular estimation of eulipotyphlan divergence times and the evolution of “Insectivora.”. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol.28, 285–296. 10.1016/s1055-7903(03)00119-2
9
DumbacherJ. P. (2016). Petrosaltator gen. nov., a new genus replacement for the North African sengi Elephantulus rozeti (Macroscelidea; Macroscelididae). Zootaxa4136, 567–579. 10.11646/zootaxa.4136.3.8
10
EizirikE.MurphyW. J.O’BrienS. J. (2001). Molecular dating and biogeography of the early placental mammal radiation. J. Hered.92, 212–219. 10.1093/jhered/92.2.212
11
EversonK. M.SoarimalalaV.GoodmanS. M.OlsonL. E. (2016). Multiple loci and complete taxonomic sampling resolve the phylogeny and biogeographic history of tenrecs (mammalia: tenrecidae) and reveal higher speciation rates in Madagascar’s humid forests. Syst. Biol.65, 890–909. 10.1093/sysbio/syw034
12
FoleyN. M.MasonV. C.HarrisA. J.BredemeyerK. R.DamasJ.LewinH. A.et al (2023). A genomic timescale for placental mammal evolution. Science380, eabl8189. 10.1126/science.abl8189
13
GheerbrantE.FilippoA.SchmittA. (2016). Convergence of afrotherian and laurasiatherian ungulate-like mammals: first morphological evidence from the Paleocene of Morocco. PLoS One11, e0157556. 10.1371/journal.pone.0157556
14
GrunstraN. D. S.HollinetzF.Bravo MoranteG.ZachosF. E.PfaffC.WinklerV.et al (2024). Convergent evolution in Afrotheria and Non-afrotherians demonstrates high evolvability of the mammalian inner ear. Nat. Commun.15, 7869. 10.1038/s41467-024-52180-1
15
HallströmB. M.JankeA. (2008). Resolution among major placental mammal interordinal relationships with genome data imply that speciation influenced their earliest radiations. BMC Evol. Biol.8, 162. 10.1186/1471-2148-8-162
16
HallströmB. M.JankeA. (2010). Mammalian evolution may not be strictly bifurcating. Mol. Biol. Evol.27, 2804–2816. 10.1093/molbev/msq166
17
HasegawaM.ThorneJ. L.KishinoH. (2003). Time scale of eutherian evolution estimated without assuming a constant rate of molecular evolution. Genes Genet. Syst.78, 267–283. 10.1266/ggs.78.267
18
HedgesS. B. (2001). Afrotheria: plate tectonics meets genomics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.98, 1–2. 10.1073/pnas.98.1.1
19
HedgesS. B.KumarS. (2009). The timetree of life. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
20
HedgesS. B.ParkerP. H.SibleyC. G.KumarS. (1996). Continental breakup and the ordinal diversification of birds and mammals. Nature381, 226–229. 10.1038/381226a0
21
HedgesS. B.TaoQ.WalkerM.KumarS. (2018). Accurate timetrees require accurate calibrations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.115, E9510–E9511. 10.1073/pnas.1812558115
22
HeritageS.SeiffertE. R. (2022). Total evidence time-scaled phylogenetic and biogeographic models for the evolution of sea cows (Sirenia, Afrotheria). PeerJ10, e13886. 10.7717/peerj.13886
23
KitazoeY.KishinoH.WaddellP. J.NakajimaN.OkabayashiT.WatabeT.et al (2007). Robust time estimation reconciles views of the antiquity of placental mammals. PLoS One2, e384. 10.1371/journal.pone.0000384
24
KumarS.HedgesS. B. (1998). A molecular timescale for vertebrate evolution. Nature268, 917–920. 10.1038/31927
25
KumarS.SuleskiM.CraigJ. M.KasprowiczA. E.SanderfordM.LiM.et al (2022). TimeTree 5: an expanded resource for species divergence times. Mol. Biol. Evol.39, msac174. 10.1093/molbev/msac174
26
KumarS.StecherG.SuleskiM.SanderfordM.SharmaS.TamuraK. (2024). MEGA12: molecular evolutionary genetic analysis version 12 for adaptive and green computing. Mol. Biol. Evol.41, msae263. 10.1093/molbev/msae263
27
LaurinM.LapauzeO.MarjanovićD. (2022). What do ossification sequences tell us about the origin of extant amphibians?Peer Community J.2, e12. 10.24072/pcjournal.89
28
LiuL.ZhangJ.RheindtF. E.LeiF.QuY.WangY.et al (2017). Genomic evidence reveals a radiation of placental mammals uninterrupted by the KPg boundary. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.114, E7282–E7290. 10.1073/pnas.1616744114
29
MadsenO.ScallyM.DouadyC. J.KaoD. J.DeBryR. W.AdkinsR.et al (2001). Parallel adaptive radiations in two major clades of placental mammals. Nature409, 610–614. 10.1038/35054544
30
MeredithR. W.JanečkaJ. E.GatesyJ.RyderO. A.FisherC. A.TeelingE. C.et al (2011). Impacts of the Cretaceous Terrestrial revolution and KPg extinction on mammal diversification. Science334, 521–524. 10.1126/science.1211028
31
MorrisonD. A. (2009). The timetree of life. In HedgesS. B.KumarS., editors. Systematic biology. Oxford, Uk: Oxford University Press. p. 461–462.
32
MurphyW. J.EizirikE.JohnsonW. E.ZhangY. P.RyderO. A.O’BrienS. J. (2001a). Molecular phylogenetics and the origins of placental mammals. Nature409, 614–618. 10.1038/35054550
33
MurphyW. J.EizirikE.O’BrienS. J.MadsenO.ScallyM.DouadyC. J.et al (2001b). Resolution of the early placental mammal radiation using Bayesian phylogenetics. Science294, 2348–2351. 10.1126/science.1067179
34
MurphyW. J.PringleT. H.CriderT. A.SpringerM. S.MillerW. (2007). Using genomic data to unravel the root of the placental mammal phylogeny. Genome Res.17, 413–421. 10.1101/gr.5918807
35
NikaidoM.KawaiK.CaoY.HaradaM.TomitaS.OkadaN.et al (2001). Maximum likelihood analysis of the complete mitochondrial genomes of eutherians and a reevaluation of the phylogeny of bats and insectivores. J. Mol. Evol.53, 508–516. 10.1007/s002390010241
36
O’LearyM. A.BlochJ. I.FlynnJ. J.GaudinT. J.GiallombardoA.GianniniN. P.et al (2013). The placental mammal ancestor and the post-K-Pg radiation of placentals. Science339, 662–667. 10.1126/science.1229237
37
PoulakakisN.StamatakisA. (2010). Recapitulating the evolution of Afrotheria: 57 genes and rare genomic changes (RGCs) consolidate their history. Syst. Biodivers.8, 395–408. 10.1080/14772000.2010.484436
38
SandersonM. J.McMahonM. M.SteelM. (2010). Phylogenomics with incomplete taxon coverage: the limits to inference. BMC Evol. Biol.10, 155. 10.1186/1471-2148-10-155
39
SchneiderC. A.RasbandW. S.EliceiriK. W. (2012). NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods9, 671–675. 10.1038/nmeth.2089
40
SchochC. L.CiufoS.DomrachevM.HottonC. L.KannanS.KhovanskayaR.et al (2020). NCBI taxonomy: a comprehensive update on curation, resources and tools. Database2020, baaa062–21. 10.1093/database/baaa062
41
SenS. (2013). Dispersal of African mammals in eurasia during the Cenozoic: ways and whys. Geobios46, 159–172. 10.1016/j.geobios.2012.10.012
42
SharmaS.KumarS. (2021). Fast and accurate bootstrap confidence limits on genome-scale phylogenies using little bootstraps. Nat. Comput. Sci.1, 573–577. 10.1038/s43588-021-00129-5
43
SmitH. A.Jansen van VuurenB.O’BrienP. C. M.Ferguson-SmithM.YangF.RobinsonT. J. (2011). Phylogenetic relationships of elephant‐shrews (Afrotheria, Macroscelididae): Elephant-shrew phylogeny. J. Zool. (1987)284, 133–143. 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2011.00790.x
44
SoaresP.AbrantesD.RitoT.ThomsonN.RadivojacP.LiB.et al (2013). Evaluating purifying selection in the mitochondrial DNA of various mammalian species. PLoS One8, e58993. 10.1371/journal.pone.0058993
45
SpringerM. S. (2022). Afrotheria. Curr. Biol.32, R205–R210. 10.1016/j.cub.2022.02.001
46
SpringerM. S.ClevenG. C.MadsenO.de JongW. W.WaddellV. G.AmrineH. M.et al (1997). Endemic African mammals shake the phylogenetic tree. Nature388, 61–64. 10.1038/40386
47
SpringerM. S.MeredithR. W.JaneckaJ. E.MurphyW. J. (2011). The historical biogeography of Mammalia. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.366, 2478–2502. 10.1098/rstb.2011.0023
48
StanhopeM. J.MadsenO.WaddellV. G.ClevenG. C.de JongW. W.SpringerM. S. (1998a). Highly congruent molecular support for a diverse superordinal clade of endemic African mammals. Mol. Phylogenet Evol.9, 501–508. 10.1006/mpev.1998.0517
49
StanhopeM. J.WaddellV. G.MadsenO.de JongW.HedgesS. B.ClevenG. C.et al (1998b). Molecular evidence for multiple origins of insectivora and for a new order of endemic African insectivore mammals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.95, 9967–9972. 10.1073/pnas.95.17.9967
50
TamuraK.BattistuzziF. U.Billing-RossP.MurilloO.FilipskiA.KumarS. (2012). Estimating divergence times in large molecular phylogenies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.109, 19333–19338. 10.1073/pnas.1213199109
51
TamuraK.TaoQ.KumarS. (2018). Theoretical foundation of the reltime method for estimating divergence times from variable evolutionary rates. Mol. Biol. Evol.35, 1770–1782. 10.1093/molbev/msy044
52
TamuraK.StecherG.KumarS. (2021). MEGA11: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol.38, 3022–3027. 10.1093/molbev/msab120
53
UphamN. S.EsselstynJ. A.JetzW. (2021). Molecules and fossils tell distinct yet complementary stories of mammal diversification. Curr. Biol.31, 4195–4206.e3. 10.1016/j.cub.2021.07.012
54
van DijkM. A.MadsenO.CatzeflisF.StanhopeM. J.de JongW. W.PagelM. (2001). Protein sequence signatures support the African clade of mammals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.98, 188–193. 10.1073/pnas.98.1.188
55
WiensJ. J. (2003). Missing data, incomplete taxa, and phylogenetic accuracy. Syst. Biol.52, 528–538. 10.1080/10635150309308
56
WildmanD. E.UddinM.OpazoJ. C.LiuG.LefortV.GuindonS.et al (2007). Genomics, biogeography, and the diversification of placental mammals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.104, 14395–14400. 10.1073/pnas.0704342104
57
WilliamsonT. E.BrusatteS. L.WilsonG. P. (2014). The origin and early evolution of metatherian mammals: the Cretaceous record. Zookeys465, 1–76. 10.3897/zookeys.465.8178
58
YazhiniA.SrinivasanN.SandhyaS. (2021). Signatures of conserved and unique molecular features in Afrotheria. Sci. Rep.11, 1011. 10.1038/s41598-020-79559-6
Summary
Keywords
Afrotheria, KPg, phylogeny, dating, evolution
Citation
Craig JM, Fisher WL, Thomas AS, Hedges SB and Kumar S (2025) Completing a molecular timetree of Afrotheria. Front. Bioinform. 5:1710926. doi: 10.3389/fbinf.2025.1710926
Received
22 September 2025
Revised
20 October 2025
Accepted
21 October 2025
Published
19 November 2025
Volume
5 - 2025
Edited by
Ana Duggan, Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC), Canada
Reviewed by
Carlos G. Schrago, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Jonathan James Hughes, Independent Researcher, Toronto, ON, Canada
Updates
Copyright
© 2025 Craig, Fisher, Thomas, Hedges and Kumar.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Sudhir Kumar, s.kumar@temple.edu
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.