¹ Colomer, Josep M., ‘It's Parties That Choose Electoral Systems (or, Duverger's Laws Upside Down)’, Political Studies, 53: 1 (2005), pp. 1–21 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, quoted on p. 2.

² Ibid., pp. 17–18.Google Scholar

³ Grumm, John G., ‘Theories of Electoral Systems’, Midwest Journal of Political Science, 2: 4 (1958), pp. 357–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Stein Rokkan, Citizens, Elections, Parties, Oslo, Universitetsforlaget, 1970; Carles Boix, ‘Setting the Rules of the Game: The Choice of Electoral Systems in Advanced Democracies’, American Political Science Review, 93: 3 (1999), pp. 609–24; Kenneth Benoit, ‘Models of Electoral System Change’, Electoral Studies, 23 (2004), pp. 363–89.

⁴ Richard Katz, ‘Why Are There so Many (or so Few) Electoral Reforms?’, in Michael Gallagher and Paul Mitchell (eds), The Politics of Electoral Systems, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2005, pp. 57–76, quoted at p. 63.Google Scholar

⁵ Report of the Royal Commission on the Electoral System: Towards a Better Democracy, Wellington, New Zealand Government Printer, 1986, para. 2.8.Google Scholar

⁶ Ibid., para. 2.1.Google Scholar

⁷ Lijphart, Arend, ‘The Demise of the Last Westminster System? Comments on the Report of New Zealand's Royal Commission on the Electoral System’, Electoral Studies, 6: 2 (1987), pp. 97–103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, quoted on p. 100.

⁸ See, for example, Matthew Soberg Shugart and Martin P. Wattenberg (eds), Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001; and Arend Lijphart, Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries, New Haven, CT, Yale University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

⁹ Harris, Paul, ‘Changing New Zealand's Electoral System: The 1992 Referendum’, Representation, 31: 115 (1992), pp. 53–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar, quoted on p. 54.

¹⁰ David Denemark, ‘Choosing MMP in New Zealand: Explaining the 1993 Electoral Reform’, in Shugart and Wattenberg, Mixed-Member Electoral Systems, pp. 70–95.Google Scholar

¹¹ Jack H. Nagel, ‘New Zealand: Reform by (Nearly) Immaculate Design’, in Josep M. Colomer (ed.), Handbook of Electoral System Choice, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2004, pp. 530–43, quoted on p. 542.Google Scholar

¹² McLean, Iain, ‘The Jenkins Commission and the Implications of Electoral Reform for the UK’, Government and Opposition, 34: 2 (1999), pp. 143–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹³ Andrew Rawnsley, Servants of the People: The Inside Story of New Labour, London, Hamish Hamilton, 2000, quoted on p. 203.Google Scholar

¹⁴ McLean, ‘The Jenkins Commission’, p. 153.Google Scholar

¹⁵ Report of the Independent Commission on the Voting System, Chairman Lord Jenkins of Hillhead, London, The Stationery Office, 1998, Cm 4090-I, Chapter 9.Google Scholar

¹⁶ Shugart, Matthew Soberg, ‘The Jenkins Paradox: A Complex System, Yet Only a Timid Step Towards PR’, Representation, 36: 2 (Summer 1999), pp. 143–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar, quoted on p. 143.

¹⁷ Nagel, ‘New Zealand’, p. 542.Google Scholar

¹⁸ John Morrison, Reforming Britain: New Labour, New Constitution?, London, Reuters, Pearson Education, 2001, p. 244.Google Scholar

¹⁹ Ibid., p. 254.Google Scholar

²⁰ Ibid., p. 266.Google Scholar

²¹ British Columbia Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform, ‘Making Every Vote Count: The Case for Electoral Reform in British Columbia’, Final Report, Victoria, 2004, pp. 10–13.Google Scholar

²² Milner, Henry, ‘First Past the Post? Progress Report on Electoral Reform Initiatives in Canadian Provinces’, Policy Matters, 5: 9 (September 2004 Google Scholar), quoted on p. 22.

²³ Carty, R. Kenneth, ‘Canadians and Electoral Reform: An Impulse to Doing Democracy Differently’, Representation, 40: 3 (2004), pp. 173–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar, quoted on p. 174.

²⁴ Cairns, Alan C., ‘The Electoral System and the Party System in Canada, 1921–1965’, Canadian Journal of Political Science, 1 (1968), pp. 55–80 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, quoted on p. 64.

²⁵ William P. Irvine, Does Canada Need a New Electoral System?, Kingston, Queen's University Institute of Intergovernmental Relations, 1979.Google Scholar

²⁶ Law Commission of Canada, Voting Counts: Electoral Reform for Canada, Ottawa, Ministry of Public Works and Services, 2004, pp. 99–100.Google Scholar

²⁷ Government of Quebec, ‘Draft Legislation Replacing the Election Act’, Background Paper, Quebec City, 2004, p. 6.Google Scholar

²⁸ New Brunswick Commission on Legislative Democracy, Final Report and Recommendations, Fredericton, 2004, p. 46.Google Scholar

²⁹ Prince Edward Island Electoral Reform Commission, ‘Prince Edward Island Electoral Reform Commission Report’, Charlottetown, 2003, p. 98.Google Scholar

³⁰ Ontario Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform, ‘One Ballot, Two Votes: A New Way to Vote in Ontario’, Toronto, 2007, p. 1.Google Scholar

³¹ BC Citizens' Assembly, Final Report, p. 1.Google Scholar

³² BC Citizens' Assembly, Making Every Vote Count: The Case for Electoral Reform in British Columbia, Technical Report, Victoria, 2004, p. 92.Google Scholar

³³ BC Citizens' Assembly, Final Report, p. 6.Google Scholar

³⁴ Ibid., p. 5.Google Scholar

³⁵ Ibid.Google Scholar

³⁶ Richard Warnica, ‘Hot Box for Campbell: Vote Reform’, TheTyee.ca, 9 June 2005, at http://www.thetyee.ca/News/2005/06/09/HotBox.Google Scholar

³⁷ British Columbia, ‘B.C. to Hold Second Referendum on Electoral Reform’, news release, Office of the Premier, Victoria, 12 September 2005.Google Scholar

³⁸ Cross, William, ‘The Rush to Electoral Reform in the Canadian Provinces: Why Now?’, Representation, 41: 2 (2005), pp. 75–84 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, quoted on p. 81.