Randomized, Multicenter, Comparative Study of NEURO versus CIMT in Poststroke Patients with Upper Limb Hemiparesis: The NEURO-VERIFY Study
Abstract
Background
Many poststroke patients suffer functional motor limitation of the affected upper limb, which is associated with diminished health-related quality of life.
Aims
The aim of this study is to conduct a randomized, multicenter, comparative study of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with intensive occupational therapy, NEURO (NovEl intervention Using Repetitive TMS and intensive Occupational therapy) versus constraint-induced movement therapy in poststroke patients with upper limb hemiparesis.
Methods
In this randomized controlled study of NEURO and constraint-induced movement therapy, 66 poststroke patients with upper limb hemiparesis were randomly assigned at 2:1 ratio to low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation plus occupational therapy (NEURO group) or constraint-induced movement therapy (constraint-induced movement therapy group) for 15 days. Fugl–Meyer Assessment and Wolf Motor Function Test and Functional Ability Score of Wolf Motor Function Test were used for assessment.
Results
No differences in patients' characteristics were found between the two groups at baseline. The Fugl–Meyer Assessment score was significantly higher in both groups after the 15-day treatment compared with the baseline. Changes in Fugl–Meyer Assessment scores and Functional Ability Score of Wolf Motor Function Test were significantly higher in the NEURO group than in the constraint-induced movement therapy group, whereas the decrease in the Wolf Motor Function Test log performance time was comparable between the two groups (changes in Fugl–Meyer Assessment score, NEURO: 5·39 ± 4·28, constraint-induced movement therapy: 3·09 ± 4·50 points; mean ± standard error of the mean; P < 0·05) (changes in Functional Ability Score of Wolf Motor Function Test, NEURO: 3·98 ± 2·99, constraint-induced movement therapy: 2·09 ± 2·96 points; P < 0·05).
Conclusions
The results of the 15-day rehabilitative protocol showed the superiority of NEURO relative to constraint-induced movement therapy; NEURO improved the motion of the whole upper limb and resulted in functional improvement in activities of daily living.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
1. Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, et al. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: The EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2006; 296: 2095–104.
2. Nichols-Larsen DS, Clark PC, Zeringue A, Greenspan A, Blanton S. Factors influencing stroke survivors' quality of life during subacute recovery. Stroke 2005; 36: 1480–4.
3. Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 347–54.
4. Kunkel A, Kopp B, Müller G, et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy for motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: 624–8.
5. Miltner WH, Bauder H, Sommer M, Dettmers C, Taub E. Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke: A replication. Stroke 1999; 30: 586–92.
6. Page SJ, Levine P, Sisto S, Bond Q, Johnston MV. Stroke patients' and therapists' opinions of constraint-induced movement therapy. Clin Rehabil 2002; 16: 55–60.
7. Kakuda W, Abo M, Kobayashi K, et al. Baseline severity of upper limb hemiparesis influences the outcome of low-frequency rTMS combined with intensive occupational therapy in patients who have had a stroke. PMR 2011; 3: 516–22.
8. Kakuda W, Abo M, Shimizu M, et al. A multi-center study on low-frequency rTMS combined with intensive occupational therapy for upper limb hemiparesis in post-stroke patients. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2012; 9: 4.
9. Wassermann EM. Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: Report and suggested guidelines from the international workshop of the safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, June 5–7, 1996. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998; 108: 1–16.
10. Gladstone DJ, Danells CI, Black SE. The Fugl-Meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: A critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002; 16: 232–40.
11. Platz T, Pirkowski C, Van Wijck F, Kim IH, Di Bella P, Johnson G. Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, action research arm test and box and block test: A multicenter study. Clin Rehabil 2005; 19: 404–11.
12. Morris DM, Uswatte G, Crago JE, Cook EW, Taub E. The reliability of the wolf motor function test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: 750–55.
13. Wolf SL, Catlin PA, Ellis M, Archer AL, Morgan B, Piacentino A. Assessing wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke 2001; 32: 1635–39.
14. Yamada N, Kakuda W, Senoo A, et al. Functional cortical reorganization after low-frequency repetitive TMS plus intensive occupational therapy for upper limb hemiparesis: Evaluation by functional MRI in poststroke patients. Int J Stroke 2013; In press.
15. Dong Y, Dobkin BH, Cen SY, Wu AD, Winstein CJ. Motor cortex activation during treatment may predict therapeutic gains in paretic hand function after stroke. Stroke 2006; 37: 1552–5.
16. Kakuda W, Abo M, Kobayashi K, et al. Anti-spastic effect of low-frequency rTMS applied with occupational therapy in post-stroke patients with upper limb hemiparesis. Brain Injury 2011; 25: 496–502.
17. Kondo T, Kakuda W, Yamada N, Shimizu M, Hagino H, Abo M. Effect of low-frequency rTMS on motor neuron excitability after stroke. Acta Neurol Scand 2013; 127: 26–30.
Cite
Cite
Cite
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: September 9, 2013
Issue published: July 2014
Keywords
PubMed: 24015934
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in International Journal of Stroke.
View All Journal MetricsPublication usage*
Total views and downloads: 1299
*Publication usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Publications citing this one
Receive email alerts when this publication is cited
Web of Science: 58 view articles Opens in new tab
Crossref: 68
- Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Efficacy of Shorter Duration Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (mCIMT) Programs
- The efficacy of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on upper extremity function in intracerebral hemorrhage: a real-world retrospective cohort study
- Function-specific repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for fine motor rehabilitation in chronic stroke: a case report
- Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Neurosurgery
- Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Occupational Therapy Protocol for Upper Limb Motor Recovery in Stroke Patients
- Effects of the intermittent theta burst stimulation on gait, balance and lower limbs motor function in stroke: study protocol for a double-blind randomised controlled trial with multimodal neuroimaging assessments
- Impact of Shaking Exercise on Functional Recovery in Patients with Chronic Post-Stroke Upper Limb Impairment: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Quasi-Randomized Controlled Trial
- Global research hotspots and trends in constraint-induced movement therapy in rehabilitation over the past 30 years: a bibliometric and visualization study
- Editorial: Neuromuscular adaptations to sensorimotor stimulation protocols: potential rehabilitative interventions for individuals with central or peripheral neuromuscular injuries
- Changes in Structural Neural Networks in the Recovery Process of Motor Paralysis after Stroke
- View More
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
I am signed in as:
View my profileSign out
I can access personal subscriptions, purchases, paired institutional access and free tools such as favourite journals, email alerts and saved searches.
loading institutional access options
World Stroke Organization members can access journal content using society membership credentials.
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
