Effects of Augmentative and Alternative Communication Intervention on Speech Production in Children With Autism: A Systematic Review
Publication: American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
Volume 17, Number 3
Pages 212-230
Abstract
Purpose
This systematic review aimed to determine the effects of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) intervention on speech production in children with autism or pervasive developmental disorder-not otherwise specified.
Method
A systematic review methodology was utilized to limit bias in searching, selecting, coding, and synthesizing relevant treatment studies. This involved a multifaceted search for studies written between 1975 and May 2007 using various bibliographic databases, dissertation databases, hand searches of selected journals and published compilations of AAC theses and dissertations, and ancestry searches. To be included, studies had to meet stringent criteria. A coding manual and form facilitated data extraction in terms of participant characteristics, treatment characteristics, design and measurement, and outcomes.
Results
Nine single-subject experimental design (27 participants) and 2 group studies (98 participants) were included. Results indicated that AAC interventions do not impede speech production. In fact, most studies reported an increase in speech production. However, in-depth analyses revealed that the gains were rather modest.
Conclusions
Although AAC interventions do not appear to impede speech production and may result in increased speech production, the modest gains observed require realistic expectations among clinicians and other stakeholders. Future research should be more hypothesis driven and aim to identify predictive child characteristics, such as prior speech imitation and object exploration skills.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Studies that were included are identified with an asterisk.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2002). Augmentative and alternative communication: Knowledge and skills for service delivery [Knowledge and Skills]. Available from www.asha.org/policy
Anderson, A. E. (2002). Augmentative communication and autism: A comparison of sign language and the Picture Exchange Communication System (Doctoral dissertation, University of California at Santa Barbara, 2001). Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 62, 4269.
Balandin, S. (2007). Unaided AAC interventions appear to facilitate the development of speech. Rigorous research is required to establish the effects of AAC systems and interventions on speech production across a variety of populations with developmental disabilities [Abstract]. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 1, 63–64. Abstract of Millar, D., Light, J. C., and Schlosser, R. W. (2006). Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 248–264.
Barlow, D. H., & Hersen, M. (1973). Single case experimental designs: Uses in applied clinical research. Archives of General Psychiatry, 29, 319–325.
Bedrosian, J. (2003). On the subject of subject selection in AAC: Implications for planning and interpreting efficacy research. In Schlosser, R. W. (Ed.), The efficacy of augmentative and alternative communication: Towards evidence-based practice (pp. 57–83). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Blischak, D. M., Lombardino, L. J., & Dyson, A. T. (2003). Use of speech-generating devices: In support of natural speech. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 29–35.
Bopp, K. D., Brown, K. E., & Mirenda, P. (2004). Speech-language pathologists' roles in the delivery of positive behavior support for individuals with developmental disabilities. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13, 5–19.
Carr, E. G., Binkoff, J. A., Kologinsky, E., & Eddy, M. (1978). Acquisition of sign language by autistic children. I: Expressive labelling. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 489–501.
Carr, D., & Felce, J. (2007a). Brief report: Increase in production of spoken words in some children with autism after PECS teaching to Phase III. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 780–787.
Carr, D., & Felce, J. (2007b). The effects of PECS teaching to Phase III on the communicative interactions between children with autism and their teachers. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 724–737.
Charlop-Christy, M. H., Carpenter, M., Le, L., LeBlanc, L. A., & Kellet, K. (2002). Using the Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) with children with autism: Assessment of PECS acquisition, speech, social-communicative behavior, and problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 213–231.
Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Rev. ed.). New York: Academic Press.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cohen, M. (1979, April). The development of language behavior in an autistic child using a total communication approach. Paper presented at the Annual International Convention, The Council for Exceptional Children, Dallas, TX.
DiCarlo, C., Stricklin, S., Banajee, M., & Reid, D. (2002). Effects of manual signing on communicative verbalizations by toddlers with and without disabilities in inclusive classrooms. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 26, 1201–1226.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.
Ferrara, S. M. (2005). Voice output communication aids or picture communication system: The efficient way for individuals with severe disabilities to acquire communication (Master’s thesis, California State University, Fullerton). Retrieved February 10, 2007, from ProQuest Digital Dissertations database (Publication No. AAT 1429622).
Fombonne, E. (2003). The prevalence of autism. Journal of the American Medical Association, 289, 1–3.
Frost, L., & Bondy, A. (2002). Picture Exchange Communication System training manual (2nd ed.). Newark, DE: Pyramid Education Products.
Ganz, J. (2002). Collateral effects of an augmentative communication system on word utterances in children with characteristics of autism (Doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas, 2001). Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 63, 3516.
Ganz, J. B., & Simpson, R. L. (2004). Effects on communicative requesting and speech development of the Picture Exchange Communication System in children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34, 395–409.
Ganz, J. B., Simpson, R. L., & Corbin-Newsome, J. (2007). The impact of the Picture Exchange Communication System on requesting and speech development in preschoolers with autism spectrum disorders and similar characteristics [Electronic version]. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 2, 157–169.
Goldstein, H. (2002). Communication intervention for children with autism: A review of treatment efficacy. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32, 373–396.
Granlund, M., & Olsson, C. (1999). Efficacy of communication intervention for presymbolic communicators. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15, 25–37.
Howlin, P., Gordon, R. K., Pasco, G., Wade, A., & Charman, T. (2007). The effectiveness of picture exchange communication (PECS) training for teachers of children with autism: A pragmatic group randomized controlled trial. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48, 473–481.
Kavale, K. A., Mathur, S. R., Forness, S. R., Quinn, M. M., & Rutherford, R. B. (2000). Right reason in the integration of group and single-subject research in behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 25, 142–157.
Koita, H., & Sonoyama, S. (2004). Communication training using the Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS): Case study of a child with autistic disorder. Japanese Journal of Behavior Analysis, 19, 161–174.
Koita, H., Sonoyama, S., & Takeuchi, K. (2003). Communication training with the Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) for children with autistic disorder: The training program and current and future research. Japanese Journal of Behavior Analysis, 18, 120–130.
Koul, R., Schlosser, R. W., & Sanscribrian, S. (2001). Effects of symbol, referent, and instructional variables on the acquisition of aided and unaided symbols by individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 16, 162–169.
Lancioni, G. E., O’Reilly, M. F., Cuvo, A. J., Singh, N. N., Sigafoos, J., & Didden, R. (2007). PECS and VOCAs to enable students with developmental disabilities to make requests: An overview of the literature. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 28, 468–488.
Layton, T. L. (1988). Language training with autistic children using four different modes of presentation. Journal of Communication Disorders, 21, 333–350.
Light, J. C., Beukelman, D. R., & Reichle, J. (2003). Communicative competence for individuals who use AAC: From research to effective practice. Baltimore: Brookes.
Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lloyd, L. L., Fuller, D. R., & Arvidson, H. H. (1997). Augmentative and alternative communication: A handbook of principles and practices. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Millar, D., Light, J., & Schlosser, R. (2006). The impact of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on speech production of individuals with developmental disabilities: A research review. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 248–264.
Mirenda, P. (2001). Autism, augmentative communication, and assistive technology: What do we really know? Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 16, 141–151.
Mirenda, P. (2003). Toward functional augmentative and alternative communication for students with autism: Manual signs, graphic symbols, and voice output communication aids. Language, Speech, and Hearing Service in Schools, 34, 203–216.
Mirenda, P., & Erickson, K. (2000). Augmentative communication and literacy. In Wetherby, A., & Prizant, B. (Eds.), Autism spectrum disorders: A transactional developmental perspective (pp. 333–367). Baltimore: Brookes.
*Olive, M., de la Cruz, B., Davis, T. N., Chan, J. M., Lang, R. B., O’Reilly, M. F., & Dickson, S. M. (2007). The effects of enhanced milieu teaching and a voice output communication aid on the requesting of three children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 1505–1513.
*Parsons, C. L., & LaSorte, D. (1993). The effect of computers with synthesized speech and no speech on the spontaneous communication of children with autism. Australian Journal of Human Communication Disorders, 21, 12–31.
Paul, R. (2003). Promoting social communication in high functioning individuals with autistic spectrum disorders. Child Adolescent Psychiatry Clinics of North America, 12, 87–106.
Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Potter, B., & Brown, D. (1997). Review of the studies examining the nature of selection-based and topography-based verbal behavior. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 14, 85–104.
Schlosser, R. W. (2003). Effects of AAC on natural speech development. In Schlosser, R. W. (Ed.), The efficacy of augmentative and alternative communication: Towards evidence-based practice (pp. 403–425). New York: Academic Press.
Schlosser, R. W., & Blischak, D. M. (2001). Is there a role for speech output in interventions for persons with autism? A review. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 16, 170–178.
Schlosser, R. W., & Goetze, H. (1992). Effectiveness and treatment validity of interventions addressing self-injurious behavior: From narrative reviews to meta-analysis. In Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities, 7(pp. 135–175). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Schlosser, R. W., & Sigafoos, J. (2002). Selecting graphic symbols for an initial request lexicon: Integrative review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 102–123.
*Schlosser, R. W., Sigafoos, J., Luiselli, J., Angermeier, K., Schooley, K., Harasymowyz, U., & Belfiore, J. (2007). Effects of synthetic speech output on requesting and natural speech production in children with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 1, 139–163.
Schlosser, R. W., & Wendt, O. (2006). The effects of AAC intervention on speech production in autism: A coding manual and form. Unpublished manuscript, Northeastern University, Boston.
Schlosser, R. W., Wendt, O., Angermeier, K., & Shetty, M. (2005). Searching for and finding evidence in augmentative and alternative communication: Navigating a scattered literature. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21, 233–255.
Schlosser, R. W., Wendt, O., Bhavnani, S., & Nail-Chiwetalu, B. J. (2006). The use of information seeking strategies in evidence-based practice: The case of pearl growing. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 41, 567–582.
Schlosser, R. W., Wendt, O., & Sigafoos, J. (2007). Not all systematic reviews are created equal: Considerations for appraisal. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 1, 138–150.
Schwartz, I. S., Garfinkle, A. N., & Bauer, J. (1998). The Picture Exchange Communication System: Communicative outcomes for young children with disabilities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 18, 144–159.
Schwartz, J. B., & Nye, C. (2006). A systematic review, synthesis, and evaluation of the evidence for teaching sign language to children with autism. EBP Briefs, 1, 1–17.
Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & Casto, G. (1987). The quantitative synthesis of single subject research methodology: Methodology and validation. Remedial and Special Education, 8, 24–33.
Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., Cook, S. B., & Escobar, C. (1986). Early intervention for children with conduct disorders: A quantitative synthesis of single-subject research. Behavioral Disorders, 11, 260–271.
Sigafoos, J., & Drasgow, E. (2001). Conditional use of aided and unaided AAC: A review and clinical case demonstration. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 16, 152–161.
Simeonsson, R., & Bailey, D. (1991). Evaluating programme impact: Levels of certainty. In Mitchell, D., & Brown, R. (Eds.), Early intervention studies for young children with special needs (pp. 280–296). London: Chapman and Hall.
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Son, S.-H. (2006). Comparing two modes of AAC intervention for children with autism (Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin, 2005). Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 66, 2544.
Son, S. H., Sigafoos, J., O’Reilly, M., & Lancioni, G. E. (2006). Comparing two types of augmentative and alternative communication for children with autism. Pediatric Rehabilitation, 9, 389–395.
Stoner, J. B., Beck, A. R., Bock, J. B., Hickey, K., Kosuwan, K., & Thompson, J. R. (2006). The effectiveness of the Picture Exchange Communication System with nonspeaking adults. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 154–165.
Sundberg, C., & Michael, J. (2001). The benefits of Skinner’s analysis of verbal behavior for children with autism. Behavior Modification, 25, 698–724.
Sundberg, M. (1993). Selecting a response form for nonverbal persons: Facilitated communication, pointing systems or sign language? Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 11, 99–116.
Sundberg, M., Michael, J., Partington, J., & Sundberg, C. (1996). The role of automatic reinforcement in early language acquisition. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 13, 21–37.
Tincani, M. (2003). Effects of selection-based versus topography-based communication training on the acquisition of mands by children with autism and multiple disabilities (Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University). Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 63, 2506.
*Tincani, M. (2004). Comparing the Picture Exchange Communication System and sign language training for children with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 19, 152–163.
*Tincani, M., Crozier, S., & Alazetta, L. (2006). The Picture Exchange Communication System: Effects on manding and speech development for school-aged children with autism. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 41, 177–184.
*Travis, J. (2006). The effectiveness of the Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) as an augmentative communication system for children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD): A South African pilot study. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Türkbay, T., Karaman, D., & Çiyiltepe, M. (2005). Otistik Bozuklukta Resim Degis-Tokusuna Dayali Iletisim Sisteminin Kullanilmasi: Bir Olgu Sunumu [Picture Exchange Communication System use in autistic disorder: Case report]. Çocuk ve Gençlik Ruh Sagligi Dergisi, 12, 24–29.
Weitz, C., Dexter, M., & Moore, J. (1997). AAC and children with developmental disabilities. In Glennen, S., & DeCoste, D. (Eds.), Handbook of augmentative and alternative communication (pp. 395–431). San Diego, CA: Singular.
Wendt, O. (2007). The effectiveness of augmentative and alternative communication for individuals with autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis (Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, 2006). Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 68.
White, H. D. (1994). Scientific communication and literature retrieval. In Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 41–55). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
*Yoder, P. J., & Layton, T. L. (1988). Speech following sign language training in autistic children with minimal verbal language. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 18, 217–229.
*Yoder, P. J., & Stone, W. L. (2006). A randomized comparison of the effect of two prelinguistic communication interventions on the acquisition of spoken communication in preschoolers with ASD. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 698–711.
Yokoyama, K., Naoi, N., & Yakamoto, J.-I. (2006). Teaching verbal behavior using the Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) with children with autism spectrum disorders. Japanese Journal of Special Education, 43, 485–503.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
History
- Received: Jul 25, 2007
- Accepted: Nov 7, 2007
- Published in issue: Aug 1, 2008
Key Words
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Article Metrics
View all metricsCitations
Download article citation data for:
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.
Citing Literature
- Betsybha Evangeline, Anitha Dhakshina Moorthy, Kaushikram Suriakumar Kuppa, CPR-SAT: A context-aware pictogram recommendation system – a speech assistive technology, SoftwareX, 10.1016/j.softx.2026.102635, 34, (102635), (2026).
- Joel E. Ringdahl, Sandie M. Bass-Ringdahl, Maggie A. Molony, Rose Morlino, Kelly M. Schieltz, Kayla Crook, The Impact of Extinction for Alternative Responding on Vocal Behavior, Behavior Modification, 10.1177/01454455261451165, (2026).
- Sophie Adams, Kate Zakrzewski, Tahlia King, Savannah Vecchio, Jacqueline Lim, Clancy Conlon, A scoping review of augmentative and alternative communication use in children with childhood apraxia of speech, Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 10.1080/07434618.2026.2619162, (1-12), (2026).
- Sindhusha Chandran, Narayan Sreedevi, Artificial intelligence and web-based application in articulation story illustrations for speech sound intervention: A comparative study, Journal of All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, 10.4103/jaiish.jaiish_7_25, 44, 2, (141-150), (2026).
- Laci Watkins, Matthew Klein, Literature review supports use of aided AAC systems to enhance social communication of autistic elementary school students, with further analysis warranted, Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 10.1080/17489539.2025.2608342, 19, 2, (74-81), (2026).
- Christine Syriopoulou, Eirini Paraskeva, Early Implementation of Augmentative and Alternative Communication Supports in Preschool Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Multi-Professional Perspective, Eximia, 10.47577/eximia.v15i1.567, 15, (29-46), (2026).
- Ayman Noor, Hanan Almukhalfi, El-Sayed Atlam, Talal H. Noor, Supporting Disabilities Using Artificial Intelligence and the Internet of Things: Research Issues and Future Directions, Disabilities, 10.3390/disabilities6010003, 6, 1, (3), (2025).
- Ashley R. Ajemigbitse, Theoni Mantzoros, Applying System of Least Prompts to Augmentative and Alternative Communication Intervention, Intervention in School and Clinic, 10.1177/10534512251408794, 61, 4, (172-180), (2025).
- Dandara Ohana Sampaio Gomes Nogueira, Hemilly Layanne Monteiro Rebelo, Bianca Valéria de Souza Ribeiro, Christiane do Rosário Teixeira Menezes, Luzianne Fernandes de Oliveira, Cristiane Guerreiro Pereira Abdul Massih, Maria do Perpétuo Socorro de Sousa Machado, Cinthya da Silva Lynch, EFETIVIDADE DA COMUNICAÇÃO ALTERNATIVA E AUMENTATIVA DE BAIXA TECNOLOGIA NA ESTIMULAÇÃO DE LINGUAGEM DE PACIENTES COM NECESSIDADES COMPLEXAS DE COMUNICAÇÃO EM UM CENTRO DE REABILITAÇÃO - CER III, Revista Contemporânea, 10.56083/RCV5N12-110, 5, 12, (e9998), (2025).
- Lisiane Fagundes Pozzobon, Oldair José Pozzobon, Paola Fagundes Pozzobon, Lorena Inês Peterini Marquezan, Helenise Sangoi Antunes, COMUNICAÇÃO AUMENTATIVA E ALTERNATIVA NO CONTEXTO ESCOLAR: POTENCIALIDADES, DILEMAS E MEDIAÇÃO DOCENTE NA INCLUSÃO DE UMA CRIANÇA AUTISTA NÃO VERBAL, Revista de Geopolítica, 10.56238/revgeov16n5-265, 16, 5, (e1125), (2025).
- See more
View Options
Sign In Options
ASHA member? If so, log in with your ASHA website credentials for full access.
Member Login