Abstract
This study explored the effect of fine motor skill activities on the development of attention in kindergarteners (n = 68) in five classes at a suburban public school in the Intermountain West through a pretest/posttest experimental group (n = 36) control group (n = 32) design. All children received the regular curriculum which included typical fine motor activities such as painting, coloring, writing, and play activities with small items. The treatment was a series of supplemental fine motor activities in which children used tongs, tweezers, and spoons to move small items. The assessment was the attention subtest of the Cognitive Assessment System (CAS) (Naglieri, J. A., & Das, J. P. (1997a). Cognitive assessment system. Itasca, IL: Riverside). A significant group × sex interaction with females positively responding to the treatment was found, suggesting that fine motor skill activities are effective in increasing female kindergartners’ attention. Further studies exploring effective materials for males and factors such as student choice and interest are needed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander, K. L., Entwisle, D. R., & Dauber, S. L. (1993). First-grade classroom behavior: Its short- and long-term consequences for school performance. Child Development, 64, 801–814
Barkley, R. A. (Eds.), (2006). Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A handbook for diagnosis and treatment (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford
Butler, R. W., & Copeland, D. R. (2002). Attentional processes and their remediation in children treated for cancer: A literature review and the development of a therapeutic approach. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 8, 115–124
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
DuPaul, G. J., & Stoner, G. (2003). ADHD in the schools: Assessment and intervention strategies (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford
Honig, A. S. (2006). What infants, toddlers, and preschoolers learn from play: 12 ideas. Montessori Life, 18(1), 16–21
Howse, R. B., Lange, G. L., Farran, D. C., & Boyles, C. D. (2003). Motivation and self-regulation as predictors of achievement in economically disadvantaged young children. The Journal of Experimental Education, 71(2), 151–174
Lillard, A. S. (2005). Montessori: The science behind the genius. New York: Oxford University Press
Lubienski Wentworth, R. A. (1999). Montessori for the new millennium. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
McCormick, C. C., & Schnobrich, J. N. (1971). Perceptual-motor training and improvement in concentration in a Montessori preschool. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 32, 71–77
McCormick, C. C., Schnobrich, J. N., Footlik, S. W., & Poetker, B. (1968). Improvement in reading achievement through perceptual-motor training. Research Quarterly, 39, 627–633
McCormick, C. C., Schnobrich, J. N., & Footlik, S. W. (1969). The effect of perceptual-motor training on reading achievement. Academic Therapy Quarterly, 4, 171–176
Merrell, C., & Tymms, P. (2003, April). Rasch analysis of inattentive, hyperactive and impulsive behaviour in young children and the link with academic achievement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED476136)
Naglieri, J. A., & Das, J. P. (1997a). Cognitive assessment system. Itasca, IL: Riverside
Naglieri, J. A., & Das, J. P. (1997b). Das-Naglieri cognitive assessment system. Retrieved Saturday, January 20, 2007 from the Mental Measurements Yearbook database
Penkman, L. (2004). Remediation of attention deficits in children: A focus on childhood cancer, traumatic brain injury and attention deficit disorder. Pediatric Rehabilitation, 7(2), 111–123
Rule, A. C., & Stewart, R. A. (2002). Effects of practical life materials on kindergartners’ fine motor skills. Early Childhood Education Journal, 30(1), 9–13
Sobe, N. (2004). Challenging the gaze: The subject of attention and a 1915 Montessori demonstration classroom. Educational Theory, 54(3), 281–297
Sohlberg, M., Mateer, C. (1987a). Effectiveness of an attention training program. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 9, 117–130
Sohlberg, M., Mateer, C. (1987b). Attention Process Training (APT). Washington, DC: Association for Neuropsychological Research and Development
Sohlberg, M., Johnson, L., Paule, L., Ruskin, S., & Mateer, C. (1994). Attention Process Training-II (APT-II). Washington, DC: Association for Neuropsychological Research and Development
Standing, E. M. (1984). Maria Montessori: Her life and work. New York: Penguin
Thomson, J., & Kerns, K. (2005). Pay Attention! Attention training for children ages 4–10. Retrieved January 27, 2007 from http://www.lapublishing.com/detail.asp_Q_product_id_E_PAYAT_A_Contents_E_Excerpts
Thomson, J., Kerns, K., Seidenstrang, L., Sohlberg, M., & Mateer, C. (2001). Pay Attention! A children’s attention process training program. Wake Forest, NC: Lash & Associates
Travers, R. M. W. (1985). Training human intelligence: Developing exploratory and aesthetic skills. Holmes Beach, FL: Learning Publications
Warner-Rogers, J., Taylor, A., Taylor, E., & Sandberg, S. (2000). Inattentive behavior in childhood: Epidemiology and implications for development. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(4), 520–536
Wittrock, M. C. (1986). Students’ thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching, (3rd ed.). (pp. 297–314). New York: McMillan
Woods, C. S. (2000). The cycle of movement. Montessori Life, 12(4), 21–23
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stewart, R.A., Rule, A.C. & Giordano, D.A. The Effect of Fine Motor Skill Activities on Kindergarten Student Attention. Early Childhood Educ J 35, 103–109 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-007-0169-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-007-0169-4