Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Saved research
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Journal of High Energy Physics
  3. Article

Moonshine, superconformal symmetry, and quantum error correction

  • Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
  • Open access
  • Published: 27 May 2020
  • Volume 2020, article number 146 (2020)
  • Cite this article

You have full access to this open access article

Download PDF
Save article
View saved research
Journal of High Energy Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Moonshine, superconformal symmetry, and quantum error correction
Download PDF
  • Jeffrey A. Harvey  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-5860-274X1 &
  • Gregory W. Moore2 
  • 1231 Accesses

  • 21 Citations

  • 13 Altmetric

  • Explore all metrics

A preprint version of the article is available at arXiv.

Abstract

Special conformal field theories can have symmetry groups which are interesting sporadic finite simple groups. Famous examples include the Monster symmetry group of a c = 24 two-dimensional conformal field theory (CFT) constructed by Frenkel, Lepowsky and Meurman, and the Conway symmetry group of a c = 12 CFT explored in detail by Duncan and Mack-Crane. The Mathieu moonshine connection between the K3 elliptic genus and the Mathieu group M24 has led to the study of K3 sigma models with large symmetry groups. A particular K3 CFT with a maximal symmetry group preserving (4, 4) superconformal symmetry was studied in beautiful work by Gaberdiel, Taormina, Volpato, and Wendland [41]. The present paper shows that in both the GTVW and c = 12 theories the construction of superconformal generators can be understood via the theory of quantum error correcting codes. The automorphism groups of these codes lift to symmetry groups in the CFT preserving the superconformal generators. In the case of the N = 1 supercurrent of the GTVW model our result, combined with a result of T. Johnson-Freyd implies the symmetry group is the maximal subgroup of M24 known as the sextet group. (The sextet group is also known as the holomorph of the hexacode.) Building on [41] the Ramond-Ramond sector of the GTVW model is related to the Miracle Octad Generator which in turn leads to a role for the Golay code as a group of symmetries of RR states. Moreover, (4, 1) superconformal symmetry suffices to define and decompose the elliptic genus of a K3 sigma model into characters of the N = 4 superconformal algebra. The symmetry group preserving (4, 1) is larger than that preserving (4, 4).

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Conformal Field Theories with Sporadic Group Symmetry

Article 09 October 2021

Hodge-Elliptic Genera and How They Govern K3 Theories

Article 24 April 2019

SymTFTs and duality defects from 6d SCFTs on 4-manifolds

Article Open access 28 November 2023

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • Convention Theory
  • Field Theory and Polynomials
  • Group Level Phenomena
  • K-Theory
  • Topological Groups and Lie Groups
  • Group Theory and Generalizations

References

  1. L. Álvarez-Gaumé et al., Bosonization in arbitrary genus, Phys. Lett. B 178 (1986) 41 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. L. Álvarez-Gaumé et al., Bosonization on higher genus Riemann surfaces, Commun. Math. Phys. 112 (1987) 503 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. P.S. Aspinwall and D.R. Morrison, String theory on K 3 surfaces, hep-th/9404151 [INSPIRE].

  4. P.S. Aspinwall, K 3 surfaces and string duality, hep-th/9611137 [INSPIRE].

  5. J.H. Conway et al., Atlas of finite groups, Clarendon Press, Oxford U.K. (1985).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. http://brauer.maths.qmul.ac.uk/Atlas/v3/permrep/2Co1G1-p196560B0

  7. T. Beth and M. Grassl, The quantum hamming and hexacodes, Fortschr. Phys. 46 (1998) 459.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. D. Belov and G.W. Moore, Holographic Action for the Self-Dual Field, hep-th/0605038 [INSPIRE].

  9. R. Borcherds, Monstrous moonshine and monstrous Lie superalgebras, Invent. Math. 109 (1992) 405.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. P. Candelas, G.T. Horowitz, A. Strominger and E. Witten, Vacuum configurations for superstrings, Nucl. Phys. B 258 (1985) 46 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. M.C.N. Cheng, K 3 surfaces, N = 4 dyons and the Mathieu group M24, Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 4 (2010) 623 [arXiv:1005.5415] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. M.C.N. Cheng, J.F.R. Duncan and J.A. Harvey, Umbral Moonshine, Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 08 (2014) 101 [arXiv:1204.2779] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. M.C.N. Cheng, J.F.R. Duncan and J.A. Harvey, Umbral Moonshine and the Niemeier lattices, arXiv:1307.5793 [INSPIRE].

  14. M.C.N. Cheng, S.M. Harrison, R. Volpato and M. Zimet, K 3 string theory, lattices and Moonshine, arXiv:1612.04404 [INSPIRE].

  15. V. Anagiannis and M.C.N. Cheng, TASI lectures on Moonshine, PoS(TASI 2017)010.

  16. J.H. Conway, A group of order 8, 315, 553, 613, 086, 720, 000, Bull. London Math. Soc. 1 (1969) 79.

  17. J.H. Conway and S.P. Norton, Monstrous Moonshine, Bull. London Math. Soc. 11 (1979) 308.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. J.H. Conway and S.P. Norton, Sphere packings, lattices and groups, Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften volume 290, Springer, Germany (1999).

  19. T. Creutzig, J.F.R. Duncan and W. Riedler, Self-dual vertex operator superalgebras and superconformal field theory, J. Phys. A 51 (2018) 034001 [arXiv:1704.03678] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. R.T. Curtis, A new combinatorial approach to M24 , Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 79 (1976) 25.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. L.J. Dixon, P.H. Ginsparg and J.A. Harvey, Beauty and the beast: superconformal symmetry in a Monster module, Commun. Math. Phys. 119 (1988) 221 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. L.J. Dixon, P.H. Ginsparg and J.A. Harvey, (central charge c) = 1 superconformal field theory, Nucl. Phys. B 306 (1988) 470 [INSPIRE].

  23. L. Dolan, P. Goddard and P. Montague, Conformal field theory, triality and the Monster group, Phys. Lett. B 236 (1990) 165 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. C. Dong, G. Mason and Y. Zhu, Discrete series of the Virasoro algebra and the Moonshine module, Proc. Symp. Pure Math. 56 (1994) 295.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. C. Dong, R.L. Griess Jr. and G. Hohn, Framed vertex operator algebras, codes and the Moonshine module, Commun. Math. Phys. 193 (1998) 407.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. M.R. Douglas and S. Kachru, Flux compactification, Rev. Mod. Phys. 79 (2007) 733 [hep-th/0610102] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. M.R. Douglas and N.A. Nekrasov, Noncommutative field theory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73 (2001) 977 [hep-th/0106048] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. J.F.R. Duncan, Super-Moonshine for Conway’s largest sporadic group, Duke Math. J. 139 (2007) 255.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. J.F.R. Duncan and S. Mack-Crane, The Moonshine module for Conway’s group, SIGMA 3 (2015) e10 [arXiv:1409.3829] [INSPIRE].

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. J.F.R. Duncan, M.J. Griffin and K. Ono, Proof of the umbral Moonshine conjecture, arXiv:1503.01472 [INSPIRE].

  31. J.F.R. Duncan, M.H. Mertens and K. Ono, O’Nan moonshine and arithmetic, arXiv:1702.03516.

  32. J.F.R. Duncan, M.J. Griffin and K. Ono, Moonshine, arXiv:1411.6571 [INSPIRE].

  33. T. Eguchi and A. Taormina, On the unitary representations of N = 2 and N = 4 superconformal algebras, Phys. Lett. B 210 (1988) 125 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. T. Eguchi, H. Ooguri, A. Taormina and S.-K. Yang, Superconformal algebras and string compactification on manifolds with SU(N ) holonomy, Nucl. Phys. B 315 (1989) 193 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. T. Eguchi, H. Ooguri and Y. Tachikawa, Notes on the K 3 surface and the Mathieu group M24 , Exper. Math. 20 (2011) 91 [arXiv:1004.0956] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. T. Eguchi and K. Hikami, Note on twisted elliptic genus of K 3 surface, Phys. Lett. B 694 (2011) 446 [arXiv:1008.4924] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. S. Ferrara, J.A. Harvey, A. Strominger and C. Vafa, Second quantized mirror symmetry, Phys. Lett. B 361 (1995) 59 [hep-th/9505162] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. I.B. Frenkel, J. Lepowsky and A. Meurman, A natural representation of the Fischer-Griess Monster with the modular function J as character, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 81 (1984) 3256.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. M.R. Gaberdiel, S. Hohenegger and R. Volpato, Mathieu Moonshine in the elliptic genus of K 3, JHEP 10 (2010) 062 [arXiv:1008.3778] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. M.R. Gaberdiel, S. Hohenegger and R. Volpato, Symmetries of K 3 σ-models, Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 6 (2012) 1 [arXiv:1106.4315] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. M.R. Gaberdiel, A. Taormina, R. Volpato and K. Wendland, A K 3 σ-model with \({\mathrm{\mathbb{Z}}}_2^8\) : \({\mathbbm{M}}_{20}\)M20 symmetry, JHEP 02 (2014) 022 [arXiv:1309.4127] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. M.R. Gaberdiel, C.A. Keller and H. Paul, Mathieu Moonshine and symmetry surfing, J. Phys. A 50 (2017) 474002 [arXiv:1609.09302] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. D. Gaiotto and A. Kapustin, Spin TQFTs and fermionic phases of matter, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 31 (2016) 1645044 [arXiv:1505.05856] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. D. Gaiotto and T. Johnson-Freyd, Holomorphic SCFTs with small index, arXiv:1811.00589 [INSPIRE].

  45. T. Gannon, Much ado about Mathieu, Adv. Math. 301 (2016) 322 [arXiv:1211.5531] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. T. Gannon, Monstrous Moonshine: the first twenty five years, math/0402345.

  47. The GAP group, GAP — Groups, Algorithms, and Programming, version 4.8.8 (2017), https://www.gap-system.org.

  48. F. Gliozzi, J. Scherk and D.I. Olive, Supersymmetry, supergravity theories and the dual spinor model, Nucl. Phys. B 122 (1977) 253 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. P. Goddard, Meromorphic conformal field theory, in Infinite dimensional Lie algebras and Lie groups, V. Kac ed., World Scientific, Singapore (1989).

  50. D. Gottesman, An introduction to quantum error correction and fault-tolerant quantum computation, arXiv:0904.2557.

  51. M.B. Green and J.H. Schwarz, Anomaly cancellation in supersymmetric d = 10 gauge theory and superstring theory, Phys. Lett. B 149 (1984) 117.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  52. M.J. Griffin and M. Mertens, A proof of the Thompson Moonshine conjecture, arXiv:1607.03078.

  53. D.J. Gross, J.A. Harvey, E.J. Martinec and R. Rohm, The heterotic string, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54 (1985) 502 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  54. D.J. Gross, J.A. Harvey, E.J. Martinec and R. Rohm, Heterotic string theory. 1. The free heterotic string, Nucl. Phys. B 256 (1985) 253 [INSPIRE].

  55. D.J. Gross, J.A. Harvey, E.J. Martinec and R. Rohm, Heterotic string theory. 2. The interacting heterotic string, Nucl. Phys. B 267 (1986) 75 [INSPIRE].

  56. J.A. Harvey and G.W. Moore, Algebras, BPS states and strings, Nucl. Phys. B 463 (1996) 315 [hep-th/9510182] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  57. J.A. Harvey and G.W. Moore, On the algebras of BPS states, Commun. Math. Phys. 197 (1998) 489 [hep-th/9609017] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  58. J.A. Harvey and G.W. Moore, An uplifting discussion of T-duality, JHEP 05 (2018) 145 [arXiv:1707.08888] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  59. J.A. Harvey and G.W. Moore, Conway subgroup symmetric compactifications of heterotic string, J. Phys. A 51 (2018) 354001 [arXiv:1712.07986] [INSPIRE].

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  60. J.A. Harvey and B.C. Rayhaun, Traces of singular moduli and moonshine for the Thompson group, Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 10 (2016) 23 [arXiv:1504.08179] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  61. G. Hoehn and G. Mason, The 290 fixed-point sublattices of the Leech lattice, J. Algebra 448 (2016) 618 [arXiv:1505.06420] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  62. P.S. Howe and G. Papadopoulos, Ultraviolet behavior of two-dimensional supersymmetric nonlinear σ models, Nucl. Phys. B 289 (1987) 264 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  63. C.M. Hull, Lectures on nonlinear sigma models and strings, in the proceedings of NATO Advanced Research Workshop on Super Field Theory, July 25–August 5, Vancouver, Canada (1986).

  64. C. Hull and U. Lindström, All (4, 1): σ-models with (4, q) off-shell supersymmetry, JHEP 03 (2017) 042 [arXiv:1611.09884] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  65. C. Hull and U. Lindström, The generalised complex geometry of (p, q) Hermitian geometries, Commun. Math. Phys. (2019) 1 [arXiv:1810.06489] [INSPIRE].

  66. D. Huybrechts, On derived categories of K 3 surfaces and Mathieu groups, arXiv:1309.6528 [INSPIRE].

  67. T. Johnson-Freyd, Supersymmetry and the Suzuki chain, arXiv:1908.11012 [INSPIRE].

  68. T. Johnson-Freyd, http://categorified.net/Mathcamp-SporadicGroupsClass.pdf

  69. N. Junla, Classification of certain genera of codes, lattices and vertex operator algebras, Ph.D. thesis, Kansas State University, U.S.A. (2014).

  70. S. Kachru, Elementary introduction to Moonshine, 2016, arXiv:1605.00697 [INSPIRE].

  71. S. Kachru and C. Vafa, Exact results for N = 2 compactifications of heterotic strings, Nucl. Phys. B 450 (1995) 69 [hep-th/9505105] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  72. S. Kachru, N.M. Paquette and R. Volpato, 3D string theory and umbral Moonshine, J. Phys. A 50 (2017) 404003 [arXiv:1603.07330] [INSPIRE].

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  73. A. Kapustin and R. Thorngren, Fermionic SPT phases in higher dimensions and bosonization, JHEP 10 (2017) 080 [arXiv:1701.08264] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  74. A. Karch, D. Tong and C. Turner, A web of 2d dualities: ℤ2 gauge fields and Arf invariants, SciPost Phys. 7 (2019) 007 [arXiv:1902.05550] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  75. C.A. Keller and I.G. Zadeh, Lifting 1/4-BPS states on K 3 and Mathieu Moonshine, arXiv:1905.00035 [INSPIRE].

  76. A. Konechny and A.S. Schwarz, Introduction to M(atrix) theory and noncommutative geometry, Phys. Rept. 360 (2002) 353 [hep-th/0012145] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  77. C.H. Lam, Codes and vertex operator algebras, Alg. Comb. 1109 (1999) 106.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  78. Y.-H. Lin and S.-H. Shao, Duality defect of the Monster CFT, arXiv:1911.00042 [INSPIRE].

  79. T. Mainiero, Homological tools for the quantum mechanic, arXiv:1901.02011 [INSPIRE].

  80. G. Mason, Symplectic automorphisms of K 3-surfaces (after S. Mukai and V.V. Nikulin), CWI Newslett. No. 13 (1986).

  81. N.D. Mermin, Quantum computer science. An introduction, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K. (2007).

  82. R. Miranda and D.R. Morrison, Embeddings of integral quadratic forms, http://www.math.ucsb.edu/∼drm/manuscripts/eiqf.pdf

  83. M. Miyamoto, Binary codes and vertex operator (super) algebras, J. Alg. 181 (1996) 207.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  84. G. Moore, lecture notes, http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/∼gmoore/695Fall2015/TopologicalFieldTheory.pdf.

  85. W. Nahm and K. Wendland, A hiker’s guide to K 3: aspects of N = (4, 4) superconformal field theory with central charge c = 6, Commun. Math. Phys. 216 (2001) 85 [hep-th/9912067] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  86. http://www.math.rwth-aachen.de/∼Gabriele.Nebe/LATTICES/

  87. A. Neveu and J.H. Schwarz, Factorizable dual model of pions, Nucl. Phys. B 31 (1971) 86 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  88. M.A. Nielsen and I.L. Chuang, Quantum computation and quantum information, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K. (2010).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  89. N.M. Paquette, D. Persson and R. Volpato, BPS algebras, genus zero and the heterotic monster, J. Phys. A 50 (2017) 414001 [arXiv:1701.05169] [INSPIRE].

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  90. J. Polchinski, Dirichlet branes and Ramond-Ramond charges, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 (1995) 4724 [hep-th/9510017] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  91. J. Preskill, Quantum computation, chapter 7.

  92. P. Ramond, Dual theory for free fermions, Phys. Rev. D 3 (1971) 2415 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  93. A. Taormina and K. Wendland, The overarching finite symmetry group of Kummer surfaces in the Mathieu group M24 , JHEP 08 (2013) 125 [arXiv:1107.3834] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  94. A. Taormina and K. Wendland, Symmetry-surfing the moduli space of Kummer K 3s, Proc. Symp. Pure Math. 90 (2015) 129 [arXiv:1303.2931] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  95. A. Taormina and K. Wendland, A twist in the M 24 moonshine story, arXiv:1303.3221 [INSPIRE].

  96. A. Taormina and K. Wendland, The Conway Moonshine module is a reflected K 3 theory, arXiv:1704.03813 [INSPIRE].

  97. K. Wendland, Moduli spaces of unitary conformal field theories, Ph.D. thesis, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany (2000).

  98. K. Wendland, Orbifold constructions of K 3: a link between conformal field theory and geometry, Contemp. Math. 310 (2002) 333 [hep-th/0112006] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  99. R.A. Wilson, The quaternionic lattice for 2G2 (4) and its maximal subgroups, J. Alg. 77 (1982) 449.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  100. E. Witten, Five-brane effective action in M-theory, J. Geom. Phys. 22 (1997) 103 [hep-th/9610234] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  101. E. Witten, Three-dimensional gravity revisited, arXiv:0706.3359 [INSPIRE].

Download references

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Enrico Fermi Institute and Department of Physics, University of Chicago, 5620 Ellis Ave, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA

    Jeffrey A. Harvey

  2. NHETC and Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers University, 126 Frelinghuysen Rd, Piscataway, NJ, 08855, USA

    Gregory W. Moore

Authors
  1. Jeffrey A. Harvey
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gregory W. Moore
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey A. Harvey.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

ArXiv ePrint: 2003.13700

Rights and permissions

Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Harvey, J.A., Moore, G.W. Moonshine, superconformal symmetry, and quantum error correction. J. High Energ. Phys. 2020, 146 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2020)146

Download citation

  • Received: 02 April 2020

  • Accepted: 29 April 2020

  • Published: 27 May 2020

  • Version of record: 27 May 2020

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2020)146

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Conformal Field Models in String Theory
  • Conformal Field Theory
  • Discrete Symmetries

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Footer Navigation

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z
  • Subjects A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Language editing
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover

Corporate Navigation

  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

104.23.243.59

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature