Article summary
AI generated
Understanding the impact rates of asteroids and comets on Mars and the Moon is crucial for establishing their geological histories and chronologies. This work highlights significant uncertainties in estimating Martian cratering rates, suggesting that both Martian and lunar cratering is predominantly influenced by cometary material, and proposes methods to improve the accuracy of these estimates.
Abstract
The lunar cratering rate is known reasonably well from comparison of observed crater frequencies with radiometric ages. Attempts to obtain a cratering rate for Mars have usually been based on calculation of the relative flux of asteroidal and cometary bodies on Mars and the Moon.
The asteroidal flux on Mars cannot be obtained in a simple way from the observed number of Mars-crossing asteroids, i.e. those asteroids with perihelia within the orbit of Mars. Calculations of the secular perturbations of these asteroids by several authors, particularly williams, has shown that most of these bodies rarely come near even to Mars' aphelion when they are in the vicinity of the ecliptic plane, and their contribution to the Martian meteoroid flux is much smaller than has been commonly stated. Ring asteroids in the vicinity of the ‘secular resonances’ discovered by Williams, high velocity fragments of asteroids on the inner edge of the asteroid belt, and possibly objects obtained from the 2:1 Kirkwood gap by a process described by Zimmerman and Wetherill are probably of greater importance in the 103-106 g meteoroid size range but are much less important in the production of large craters. Calculations of the Martian asteroidal and cometary impact rate are made, but the present unavoidable uncertainties in the results of these calculations result in their being of little value in establishing a Martian chronology. Suggestions for improving this situation are discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anders, E. and Arnold, J. R.: 1965,Science 149, 1494–1496.
Hartmann, W. K.: 1971,Icarus 15, 396–409.
Kozai, Y.: 1962,Astron. J. 67, 591–598.
Leighton, R. B., Murray, B. C., Sharp, R. P., Allen, J. D., and Sloan, R. K.: 1965,Science 149, 627–630.
Marsden, B. G.: 1972,Catalogue of Cometary Orbits, Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Cambridge, Mass.
McCrosky, R. E.: 1972,EOS 53, 724.
Murray, B. C., Soderbloom, L. A., Sharp, R. P., and Cutts, J. A.: 1971,J. Geophys. Res. 76, 313–330.
Öpik, 1951, J.:Proc. Roy. Irish Acad. Sci. A54, 164–199.
Öpik, E. J.: 1958,Irish Astron. J. 5, 34–36.
Öpik, E. J.: 1963,Astron. Astrophys. 2, 219–262.
Öpik, E. J.: 1966,Science 153, 255–265.
Wetherill, G. W.: 1968, in P. Millman (ed.),Meteorite Research, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland, pp. 573–589.
Wetherill, G. W. and Williams, J. G.: 1968,J. Geophys. Res. 73, 635–648.
Williams, J. G.: 1969, Ph. D. dissertation, Dept. of Planetary and Space Science, UCLA.
Williams, J. G.: 1972, in T. Gehrels (ed.),Physical Studies of Minor Planets, NASA SP-267, pp. 177–181.
Zimmerman, P. D. and Wetherill, G. W.: 1972,EOS 53, 435.
Zimmerman, P. D. and Wetherill, G. W.: 1973,EOS, in press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wetherill, G.W. Problems associated with estimating the relative impact rates on mars and the moon. The Moon 9, 227–231 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00565406
Received:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00565406