Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Saved research
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Machine Learning
  3. Article

Knowledge acquisition via incremental conceptual clustering

  • Published: September 1987
  • Volume 2, pages 139–172 (1987)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF
Save article
View saved research
Machine Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Knowledge acquisition via incremental conceptual clustering
Download PDF
  • Douglas H. Fisher1 
  • 7670 Accesses

  • 1423 Citations

  • 9 Altmetric

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

Conceptual clustering is an important way of summarizing and explaining data. However, the recent formulation of this paradigm has allowed little exploration of conceptual clustering as a means of improving performance. Furthermore, previous work in conceptual clustering has not explicitly dealt with constraints imposed by real world environments. This article presents COBWEB, a conceptual clustering system that organizes data so as to maximize inference ability. Additionally, COBWEB is incremental and computationally economical, and thus can be flexibly applied in a variety of domains.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Towards Collaborative Conceptual Exploration

Chapter © 2018

The class of cub models: statistical foundations, inferential issues and empirical evidence

Article 10 April 2019

Making Use of Empty Intersections to Improve the Performance of CbO-Type Algorithms

Chapter © 2017

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • Categorization
  • Conceptual Analysis
  • Concept Formation
  • Functional clustering
  • Knowledge Based Systems
  • Sphragistics

References

  • Brachman, R. J. (1985). I lied about the trees. AI Magazine, 6, 80–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbonell, J. G., & Hood, G. (1986). The World Modelers Project: Objectives and simulator architecture. In R. S.Michalski, J. G.Carbonell, & T. M.Mitchell (Eds.), Machine learning: A guide to current research. Boston, MA: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheeseman, P. (1985). In defense of probability. Proceedings of the Ninth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 1002–1009). Los Angeles, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y., & Fu, K. (1985). Conceptual clustering in knowledge organization. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 7, 592–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clancey, W. J. (1984). Classification problem solving. Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 49–55). Austin, TX: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietterich, T. G. (1982). Learning and inductive inference. In P. R.Cohen & E. A.Feigenbaum (Eds.), The handbook of artificial intelligence. Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietterich, T. G., & Michalski, R. S. (1983). A comparative review of selected methods of learning from examples. In R. S.Michalski, J. G.Carbonell, & T. M.Mitchell (Eds.), Machine learning: An artificial intelligence approach. Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everitt, B. (1980). Cluster analysis. London: Heinemann Educational Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feigenbaum, E. A., & Simon, H. A. (1984). EPAM-like models of recognition and learning. Cognitive Science, 8, 305–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, D. H. (1985). A hierarchical conceptual clustering algorithm (Technical Report 85–21). Irvine, CA: University of California, Department of Information and Computer Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, D. H. (1987). Knowledge acquisition via incremental conceptual clustering. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Information and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine.

  • Fisher, D. H., & Langley, P. (1985). Approaches to conceptual clustering. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 691–697). Los Angeles, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, D., & Langley, P. (1986). Methods of conceptual clustering and their relation to numerical taxonomy. In W.Gale (Ed.), Artificial intelligence and statistics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu, L., & Buchanan, B. G. (1985). Learning intermediate concepts in constructing a hierarchical knowledge base. Proceedings of the Ninth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 659–666). Los Angeles, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gennari, J. H., Langley, P., & Fisher, D. H. (1987). Models of incremental concept formation (Technical Report). Irvine, CA: University of California, Department of Information and Computer Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gluck, M. A., & Corter, J. E. (1985). Information, uncertainty, and the utility of categories. Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 283–287). Irvine, CA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, S. J., & Bauer, M. (1986). Machine learning, clustering, and polymorphy. In L. N.Kanal & J. F.Lemmer (Eds.), Uncertainty in artificial intelligence. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolodner, J. L. (1983). Reconstructive memory: A computer model. Cognitive Science, 7, 281–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langley, P., & Carbonell, J. G. (1984). Approaches to machine learning. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 35, 306–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langley, P., Kibler, D., & Granger, R. (1986). Components of learning in a reactive environment. In R. S.Michalski, J. G.Carbonell, & T. M.Mitchell (Eds.), Machine learning: A guide to current research. Boston, MA: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langley, P., & Sage, S. (1984). Conceptual clustering as discrimination learning. Proceedings of the Fifth Biennial Conference of the Canadian Society for Computational Studies of Intelligence (pp. 95–98). London, Ontario, Canada.

  • Lebowitz, M. (1982). Correcting erroneous generalizations. Cognition and Brain Theory, 5, 367–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebowitz, M. (1986a). Concept learning in a rich input domain: Generalization-based memory. In R. S.Michalski, J. G.Carbonell, & T. M.Mitchell (Eds.), Machine learning: An artificial intelligence approach (Vol. 2). Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebowitz, M. (1986b). Integrated learning: Controlling explanation. Cognitive Science, 10, 219–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medin, D. L., Wattenmaker, W. D., & Michalski, R. S. (1986). Constraints and preferences in inductive learning: An experimental study comparing human and machine performance (Technical Report ISG 86–1). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois, Department of Computer Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mervis, C. B., & Rosch, E. (1981). Categorization of natural objects. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 89–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalski, R. S. (1980). Knowledge acquisition through conceptual clustering: A theoretical framework and algorithm for partitioning data into conjunctive concepts. International Journal of Policy Analysis and Information Systems, 4, 219–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalski, R. S., & Stepp, R. E. (1983). Learning from observation: Conceptual clustering. In R. S.Michalski, J. G.Carbonell, & T. M.Mitchell (Eds.), Machine learning: An artificial intelligence approach. Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, T. M. (1982). Generalization as search. Artificial Intelligence, 18, 203–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearl, J. (1985). Learning hidden causes from empirical data. Proceedings of the Ninth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 567–572). Los Angeles, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan, J. R. (1983). Learning efficient classification procedures and their application to chess end games. In R. S.Michalski, J. G.Carbonell, & T. M.Mitchell (Eds.), Machine learning: An artificial intelligence approach. Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinke, R., & Michalski, R. S. (1986). Incremental learning of concept descriptions. Machine intelligence (Vol. 11). Oxford University Press.

  • Rendell, L. (1986). A general framework for induction and a study of selective induction. Machine Learning, 1, 177–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sammut, C., & Hume, D. (1986). Learning concepts in a complex robot world. In R. S.Michalski, J. G.Carbonell, & T. M.Mitchell (Eds.), Machine learning: A guide to current research. Boston, MA: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlimmer, J. C., & Fisher, D. H. (1986). A case study of incremental concept induction. Proceedings of the Fifth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 496–501). Philadelphia, PA: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlimmer, J. C., & Granger, R. H. (1986). Beyond incremental processing: Tracking concept drift. Proceedings of the Fifth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 502–507). Philadelphia, PA: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1969). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. E., & Medin, D. L. (1981). Categories and concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stepp, R. E. (1984). Conjunctive conceptual clustering: A methodology and experimentation (Technical Report UIUCDCS-R-84-1189). Doctoral dissertation, Department of Computer Science, University of Illinois, Urbana.

  • Stepp, R. E., & Michalski, R. S. (1986). Conceptual clustering: Inventing goal-directed classifications of structured objects. In R. S.Michalski, J. G.Carbonell, & T. M.Mitchell (Eds.), Machine learning: An artificial intelligence approach (Vol. 2). Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vere, S. A. (1978). Inductive learning of relational productions. In D.Waterman & F.Hayes-Roth (Eds.), Pattern-directed inference systems. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston, P. H. (1975). Learning structural descriptions from examples. In P. H.Winston (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Irvine Computational Intelligence Project, Department of Information and Computer Science, University of California, 92717, Irvine, California, U.S.A.

    Douglas H. Fisher

Authors
  1. Douglas H. Fisher
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fisher, D.H. Knowledge acquisition via incremental conceptual clustering. Mach Learn 2, 139–172 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00114265

Download citation

  • Received: 06 October 1986

  • Revised: 04 July 1987

  • Issue date: September 1987

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00114265

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Conceptual clustering
  • concept formation
  • incremental learning
  • inference
  • hill climbing

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Footer Navigation

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z
  • Subjects A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Language editing
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover

Corporate Navigation

  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

104.23.197.171

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature