Bonjour, Siren-Com, et bienvenue sur Wikimedia Commons. Merci pour vos contributions. J'espère ue vous allez vous plaire ici et que vous déciderez d'y rester. Voici quelques liens utiles aux nouveaux utilisateurs:
J'espère que vous apprécierez d'éditer ici et d'être un Wikipédien! Si vous ne l'avez pas déjà fait, vous pourriez vouloir vous faire un compte utilisateur sur le Wikipédia de votre langue préférée, ou sur l'un des autres projets. Incidemment, n'oubliez pas de signer vos commentaires sur les pages de discussions à l'aide de quatre tildes (~~~~), ce qui donnera automatiquement votre pseudonyme et la date, ou de trois tildes pour votre nom seul. Si vous avez avez des questions, laissez un commentaire sur le puit du village, ou posez-les moi sur ma page de discussion. Et encore bienvenue !
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Hello, I am sure than if I have seen this statue in the exibit in Paris, I will take the picture and put it on "Commons", so I think this statue was not present at the exibit. Not lukky ! ... (after more research) : I have seen again my rushes of 2019 and I have found a picture of Narcisssus but it is blur (not quite sharp picture) and the description is : Atelier Romain, Statuette of Dionysus-Narcissus, Ist century after JC. Naples, museum of national archeology. (62 cm) and not a work of Gemito. I have the book "Gemito" from Paris-Museum. This statue is reproduced, and one of "Fonderie Chiurrazzi" cire perdue copie 61 cm, and the statue by Gemito : 69 cm, 1886, (exposed at the Exposition Universelle d'Anvers, 1885) museum real Bosco di Capodimonte. In this catalogue : This two statues were exposed in Paris (number 105 and 106) ! and I don't take picture !!! It is un bilievable !! Why I don't take this tow pictures ?. If you want to see the blur picture, I can download it on Commons. - Siren-Com (talk) 18:49, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
File:Stetten-Bernard Jean studio Harcourt.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise,everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.
This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Photo by Harcourt Studio published in 1960, it is definitively not in the French public domain (70 years after publication for collective works). We can undelete in 2056 when it enters the public domain in the US.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Bonjour,
Il y a quelques années, dans une discussion, tu avais mentionné que tu avais le livre de Françoise Denoyelle de 1992 sur Harcourt. Est-ce que tu as encore ce livre ? Tu avais noté que les informations générales ne nous avançaient pas. Mais aurais-tu l'amabilité de vérifier à l'intérieur du texte du livre, s'il y a une section qui relaterait la donation des négatifs au ministère de la Culture en 1989 et la faillite de 1991 du Studio et si par hasard Françoise Denoyelle relaterait où sont allés les droits d'auteur sur les photos à ces moments ? Ou si elle n'en fait mention nulle part dans le livre ? Est-ce que les parties du livre de 1992 sur l'histoire du Studio s'arrêtent avant la faillite de 1991, ou après la faillite mais avant le rachat par un nouveau propriétaire en 1992, ou après le rachat ? Comme tu as pu le constater plus haut, quelqu'un a reparti pour un nouveau tour des discussions au sujet des photos Harcourt sur Commons. Ce serait bien si on pouvait trouver des informations solides à ce sujet. Françoise Denoyelle serait une personne qui pourrait connaître ce genre d'informations et qui en a peut-être parlé dans ce livre ou dans un livre ou un article ultérieur. Je ne sais pas si tu as encore le livre et si tu aurais le temps de fouiller ça un peu, mais merci d'avance en tout cas.
@Asclepias: , bonjour, je ne retrouve plus ce livre mais je crois qu'il s'agissait d'un petit livre essentiellement de photos (il en a plusieurs dans la série) où ne devait pas se trouver beaucoup d'informations. Il existe un autre livre paru en 2012 avec 254 pages qui serait sans doute plus complet : [1]. Il doit être consultable en bibliothèque. Il me semblait que ce problème des photos Harcourt était basé sur un jugement officiel et ceux qui ont créé la licence spécifique doivent être au courant. Cordialement - Siren-Com (talk) 11:03, 25 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Ok, merci. En effet, le livre de 2012 serait probablement plus informatif. En ce qui concerne le jugement du tribunal, si c'est ce à quoi tu réfères, ça dit que les droits d'auteur appartiennent initialement au Studio et pas aux photographes individuels. Mais c'est une question différente de celle de savoir si le Studio avait conservé ses droits d'auteur sur les photos ou s'il les a cédés à quelqu'un d'autre ou s'il les a libérés dans le domaine public lors des donations, faillite et rachat des années 1989 à 1992. Les responsables du Studio Harcourt eux-mêmes disent que les droits d'auteur des photos de 1934 à 1991 ont été libérés dans le domaine public et Commons accepte ces photos depuis lors (voir notamment le Bistro là et là). Mais il y a des utilisateurs de Commons qui refusent de croire le Studio Harcourt (voir là, en anglais). Donc, on cherche plus de sources qui pourraient éclairer la question. -- Asclepias (talk) 13:50, 25 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
2022 Picture of the Year: Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo), Little Egret (Egretta garzetta) and Gadwall (Mareca strepera) in Nepal.
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
2023 Picture of the Year: Incense plays an important role in Vietnamese life. It is considered as a sacred bridge to connect the visible life of human beings and the world of heaven, earth, and gods. Photo taken in Quang Phu Cau village, on the outskirts of Hanoi, Vietnam. In this picture, incense sticks are being set out to dry, after being dipped in the incense solution.
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2024 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year is the nineteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2024) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2024) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2024.
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Thanks for uploading File:Studio Talbot portrait ovale.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.
Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Hello, indeed, these buildings, works of 2 architect : Michel Roux-Spitz (1888-1957) and Ernest Janty (1837-1913) will enter the public domain on January 1, 2028, in two years. Sincerely. Siren-Com (talk) 12:48, 28 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2025 voting is open!
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
2024 Picture of the Year:Mundari man polishing the horns of one of his Watusi cows using a mixture of cow urine and ash as a ritualistic and protective practice in a temporary cattle camp in Terekeka, South Sudan.
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2025 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year is the twentieth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favourite images featured on Commons during the last year (2025) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just five images to become the Picture of the Year.
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favourite images featured on Commons during the last year (2025) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of five images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2025.
Latest comment: 23 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi everyone,
Wikimedia Commons is pleased to finally announce the winners of this year's Picture of the Year 2025 contest! We had some truly incredible finalists to choose from, but the community has spoken.
Here are your top three winning images:
First place: The aftermath of an Israeli airstrike in Gaza City on October 9, 2023, leaving widespread destruction in the Rimal area. Attribution: WAFA (Q2915969) / CC-BY-SA 3.0
Second place: Baby cape fur seal (Arctocephalus pusillus) sleeping at Cape cross, Namibia. Attribution: Giles Laurent / CC-BY-SA 4.0
Third place: A gigantic jet photographed from the International Space Station by astronaut Nichole Ayers. Attribution: public domain
You can view the full results and see where all your favorite images placed here: Full 2025 Results
I also want to highlight what an incredible turnout we had. In the second round, we saw a massive jump in both the number of users voting and the total votes cast. We had exactly 13,979 votes cast by 3,509 users! To put that in perspective, last year we had 7,403 votes from 2,837 users. It is amazing to see that level of growth and community engagement.
Thank you to everyone who voted, helped organize, and generally made the contest such a huge success this year!
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_studio_Harcourt.jpg){kind=link}
