User talk:Llez/Archives/2026 (1)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Annachlamys striatula, brown form, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Usefull and used --Ercé (talk) 09:51, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:56, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:27, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (01 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cochlodina costata franconica 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:37, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernigerode - Blumenuhr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:38, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernigerode - Marktstraße 17 - Hotel zur Post.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:38, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernigerode - Kochstraße 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:02, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernigerode - Kochstraße 43 - Kleinstes Haus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:01, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:53, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Annachlamys striatula, brown form, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Usefull and used --Ercé (talk) 07:42, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Gower (talk) 12:52, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Mundelfingen - Ehrentafel Erster Weltkrieg.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mundelfingen - Ehrentafel Erster Weltkrieg.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (02 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volachlamys singaporina 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:09, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernigerode - Marktstraße 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good qualoity --Michielverbeek 06:32, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernigerode - Marktstraße 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:07, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernigerode - Klintgasse 5 - Museum Schiefes Haus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:27, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernigerode - Klintgasse 5 - Museum Schiefes Haus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:08, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:49, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cochlodina costata ssp. franconica, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support very good --Gower (talk) 07:15, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:10, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (03 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volachlamys singaporina 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:27, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernigerode - Marktplatz - Wohltäterbrunnen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:28, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernigerode - Marktplatz - Wohltäterbrunnen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Tight at top but QI for me. --Scotch Mist 06:48, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernigerode - Marktplatz 1 - Rathaus 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:49, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernigerode - Marktplatz 1 - Rathaus 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:39, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (04 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isognomon isognomum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:50, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernigerode - Schloss 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:50, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernigerode - Schloss 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 08:10, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernigerode - Schloss 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 08:10, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernigerode - Westernstraße 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:48, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:46, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (05 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isognomon isognomum 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:54, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernigerode - Blick vom Schloss.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:07, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernigerode - Schloss - Infotafel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:52, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernigerode - Schloss 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:36, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernigerode - Schloss 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:54, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:47, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Isognomon isognomum (Pacific Tree Oyster), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:46, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:35, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (06 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spondylus butleri 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 07:00, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernigerode - Schloss 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 07:03, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernigerode - Schloss 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:17, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernigerode - Schloss 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:16, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernigerode - Schloss - Postbriefkasten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 07:05, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:55, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (07 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spondylus butleri 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:25, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernigerode - Schloss 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:25, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernigerode - Schloss 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:25, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernigerode - Schloss 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 09:39, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernigerode - Am Schloss 5 und 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 09:37, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:48, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Domiporta granatina 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Domiporta granatina 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:05, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spondylus butleri, juvenile, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:18, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:06, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Isognomon isognomum (Pacific Tree Oyster), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:43, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:00, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:24, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (08 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cochlodina orthostoma 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 06:39, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernigerode - Schloss 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Top of the building looks overprocessed, and there are green CAs --Benjism89 06:38, 5 January 2026 (UTC)  Done I made a completely new version from RAW --Llez 08:05, 5 January 2026 (UTC)  Support Much better, thanks --Benjism89 17:23, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernigerode - Schloss 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:23, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:46, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spondylus butleri, juvenile, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Usefull and used --Ercé (talk) 08:27, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:03, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (09 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agerostrea ungulata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:40, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cochlodina orthostoma 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 06:39, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernigerode - Schloss 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Top of the building looks overprocessed, and there are green CAs --Benjism89 06:38, 5 January 2026 (UTC)  Done I made a completely new version from RAW --Llez 08:05, 5 January 2026 (UTC)  Support Much better, thanks --Benjism89 17:23, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernigerode - Schloss 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:23, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernigerode - Schloss 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cochlodina orthostoma, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Usefull and used --Ercé (talk) 09:10, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:53, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (10 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spondylus foliaceus 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:36, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernigerode - Schloss 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:00, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernigerode - Schloss 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:00, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:47, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Agerostrea ungulata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Usefull and used --Ercé (talk) 07:46, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:52, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (11 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spondylus foliaceus 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:17, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernigerode - Schloss - Skulptur 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:17, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernigerode - Schloss - Skulptur 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:27, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernigerode - Schloss - Skulptur 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 06:43, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:51, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spondylus foliaceus, juvenile, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Usefull and used --Ercé (talk) 08:11, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:52, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (13 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Circe scripta 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:51, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Kaiserringhaus Goslar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:58, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Zwinger Goslar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:45, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Kaiserpfalz Goslar 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:29, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Kaiserpfalz Goslar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:29, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernigerode - Schloss - Skulptur 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It needs a more specific cat, same for the others --Poco a poco 07:41, 8 January 2026 (UTC)  Done Also for the others --Llez 08:51, 8 January 2026 (UTC)  Support Thank you! --Poco a poco 21:21, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:47, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Emichsburg 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Emichsburg 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (14 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Circe scripta 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:45, 11 January 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 07:31, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Steinbergturm 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:41, 11 January 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 07:31, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Rathaus Goslar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 07:31, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Gildehaus Kaiserworth 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:20, 11 January 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 07:31, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Kaiserringhaus Goslar 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 07:31, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:50, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (15 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Trink- und Wandelhalle Bad Harzburg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:38, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Trink- und Wandelhalle Bad Harzburg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:27, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Gustav-Adolf-Stabkirche 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:11, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Lohmühle Goslar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:40, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spondylus foliaceus juvenile, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support very good and useful --Gower (talk) 07:02, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:16, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Circe scripta (Script Venus), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:10, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:24, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Circe scripta (Script Venus), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:56, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Tagooty (talk) 09:33, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:26, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (16 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saccostrea glomerata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:27, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Weltkulturerbe Erzbergwerk Rammelsberg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 08:27, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Weltkulturerbe Erzbergwerk Rammelsberg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 08:27, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Trink- und Wandelhalle Bad Harzburg 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 08:27, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Trink- und Wandelhalle Bad Harzburg 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:32, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Neostyriaca corynodes ssp. saxatilis, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Gower (talk) 08:58, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:46, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saccostrea glomerata, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:45, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:20, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (18 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Rathaus Harzgerode 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 13:10, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Weltkulturerbe Erzbergwerk Rammelsberg 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 14:16, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Weltkulturerbe Erzbergwerk Rammelsberg 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aciarium 12:43, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Weltkulturerbe Erzbergwerk Rammelsberg 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 14:16, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (19 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saccostrea glomerata 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:38, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (20 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mytilus planulatus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:25, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Schloss Blankenburg 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:25, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Schloss Blankenburg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:02, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Kleines Schloss Blankenburg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:16, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:50, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (21 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siliqua radiata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:34, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Schloss Blankenburg 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:49, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Schloss Blankenburg 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 06:35, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Schloss Blankenburg 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:54, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Schloss Blankenburg 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:54, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Siemenshaus Goslar 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Small CAs at the bottom left corner (roof and white fence) --Benjism89 07:31, 16 January 2026 (UTC)  Done --Llez 09:31, 16 January 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 11:17, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:52, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (22 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siliqua radiata 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:22, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Bodetal-Seilbahn Thale 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good qulity --Michielverbeek 06:52, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Sessellift Thale 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:33, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Fels-Werke Rübeland 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:12, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Sankt-Petri-Kirche Thale 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:33, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Schloss Blankenburg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Gower 10:08, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Rathaus Blankenburg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Top of the townhall is not sharp and I hope you can fix oit --Michielverbeek 07:13, 16 January 2026 (UTC)  Done --Llez 09:31, 16 January 2026 (UTC) Ok, now --Michielverbeek 08:11, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:49, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saccostrea glomerata, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:51, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:30, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (23 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paratapes textilis 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:23, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Burg Falkenstein 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 08:55, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Burg Falkenstein 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good qua;ity --Michielverbeek 06:22, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Josephskreuz 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:24, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Carlswerk Mägdesprung 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:25, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:51, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mytilus planulatus, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:37, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:50, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Siliqua radiata, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:54, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:54, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:24, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (24 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paratapes textilis 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:28, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Schlossberg Quedlinburg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:39, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - St. Cyriakus Gernrode 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:37, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Burg Falkenstein 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:36, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Burg Falkenstein 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:11, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (25 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gafrarium divaricatum 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:36, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Klopstockhaus Quedlinburg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:38, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Schlossberg Quedlinburg 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 07:21, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Schlossberg Quedlinburg 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:43, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Schlossberg Quedlinburg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:43, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Paratapes textilis, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:52, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:12, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Siliqua radiata, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope (interesting pattern btw) --Gower (talk) 07:04, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
   Support --GRDN711 (talk) 18:30, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:50, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Paratapes textilis, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:57, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:01, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Set Promoted to FP

• 
  Lunulicardia hemicardium 01
• 
  Lunulicardia hemicardium 02

★ This set has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The set Lunulicardia hemicardium, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Lunulicardia hemicardium, has been promoted. Thank you very much for your contribution! If you would like to nominate another image or set of images, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (26 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dosinia maoriana 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:32, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Rathaus Quedlinburg 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:10, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Rathaus Quedlinburg 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:55, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Rathaus Quedlinburg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:56, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Rathaus Quedlinburg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:23, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (27 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dosinia maoriana 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:38, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Stabkirche Stiege 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:40, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Dorfkirche Tanne 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 08:58, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Lindenbeinscher Turm Quedlinburg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 08:58, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Lindenbeinscher Turm Quedlinburg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:50, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Kleines Schloss Blankenburg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Green CA, right side leaning in --Poco a poco 07:16, 16 January 2026 (UTC)  Done --Llez 09:31, 16 January 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:45, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Siemenshaus Goslar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Green CA, looks overprocessed, look at the background, burnt area --Poco a poco 07:18, 16 January 2026 (UTC)  Done --Llez 09:31, 16 January 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:45, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dosinia maoriana (Maori Dosinia), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support very good and useful --Gower (talk) 08:20, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:58, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:24, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (28 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tivela mactroides 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:32, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Kirche Elend 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:44, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Bahnhof Schierke 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:44, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Bahnhof Drei Annen Hohne 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:07, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Bahnhof Drei Annen Hohne 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:07, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dosinia maoriana (Maori Dosinia), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:42, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:48, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (29 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Kloster Drübeck 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 09:41, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Kloster Drübeck 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 09:41, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Waldgasthaus Steinerne Renne 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good qualityt --Michielverbeek 07:35, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Brocken 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Gower 10:26, 26 January 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:33, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Ewolucja konia.jpg

Hallo,

auf Grundlage deiner Grafik habe ich eine polnischsprachige Version erstellt: File:Ewolucja konia.jpg. Aufbau und inhaltliche Aussage des Originals habe ich beibehalten; geändert wurden ausschließlich die Beschriftungen (Übersetzung ins Polnische). Vielen Dank für die Bereitstellung der ursprünglichen Grafik – sie war eine große Hilfe bei der Erstellung der lokalisierten Version.

Viele Grüße
Zwiadowca ²¹ 07:26, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tivela mactroides, (Trigonal Tivela), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:01, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:40, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (30 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tivela mactroides 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:29, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Haus Blume Wernigerode 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:31, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - St.-Sylvestri-Kirche Wernigerode 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:32, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - St.-Sylvestri-Kirche Wernigerode 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:30, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Kloster Drübeck 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:32, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (31 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pitar citrinus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:28, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Rathaus Wernigerode 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aciarium 15:32, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Ensemble Café Wien Wernigerode 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:31, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Ensemble Krummelsches Haus Wernigerode 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 09:19, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Gerhart-Hauptmann-Gymnasium Wernigerode 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:31, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tivela mactroides (Trigonal Tivela), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:48, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:59, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (01 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pitar citrinus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:26, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Schloss Wernigerode 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 07:01, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Rathaus Wernigerode 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 07:01, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Rathaus Wernigerode 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 07:01, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Rathaus Wernigerode 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:32, 29 January 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 07:01, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pitar citrinus (Yellow Pitar Venus), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Pierre André ^(talk) 09:43, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:48, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (02 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Asaphis violascens 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:11, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Schloss Wernigerode 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:10, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Schloss Wernigerode 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:11, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Schloss Wernigerode 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:28, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pitar citrinus (Yellow Pitar Venus), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:35, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:59, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (03 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Asaphis violascens 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:31, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Agraringenieurschule Wernigerode 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:34, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Dorfkirche Benzingerode 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:33, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Schloss Wernigerode 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 08:35, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Schloss Wernigerode 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 08:35, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (04 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Austriella corrugata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:37, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Kolpinghaus Halberstadt 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 07:27, 1 February 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:28, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Wassertorturm Halberstadt 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 07:27, 1 February 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:28, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - St. Moritzkirche Halberstadt 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 07:27, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Gleimhaus Halberstadt 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:44, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Asaphis violascens var. dichotoma (Pacific Asaphis), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:39, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:12, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Asaphis violascens var. dichotoma (Pacific Asaphis), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:18, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:09, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (05 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Austriella corrugata 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:25, 2 February 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 07:44, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Dom Halberstadt 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:43, 2 February 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 07:44, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Dom Halberstadt 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:41, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Dom Halberstadt 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:25, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Haus St. Florian Halberstadt 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:41, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Schloss Wernigerode 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slight cw tilt, left side leaning in --Poco a poco 08:10, 30 January 2026 (UTC)  Done --Llez 10:04, 30 January 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:19, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Schloss Schwetzingen - Porzellanhäuschen - Fliesen 03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schloss Schwetzingen - Porzellanhäuschen - Fliesen 03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (06 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Psammotella cruenta 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:29, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Dom Halberstadt 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:34, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Dom Halberstadt 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:34, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Dom Halberstadt 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:24, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Dom Halberstadt 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:14, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Austriella corrugata (Corrugate Lucina), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:53, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Austriella corrugata (Corrugate Lucina), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:55, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (07 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Psammotella cruenta 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:34, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Jagdschloss Spiegelsberge 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:38, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Schachturm Ströbeck 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:38, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - St. Martini Halberstadt 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 07:05, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - St. Martini Halberstadt 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 07:05, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Psammotella cruenta ( Operculate Sanguin), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:32, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Tagooty (talk) 15:40, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Psammotella cruenta (Operculate Sanguin), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support very good, valuable and useful --Gower (talk) 09:48, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:03, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (08 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lioconcha castrensis 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:24, 5 February 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 10:07, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Schloss Herzberg 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:24, 5 February 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 10:07, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Schloss Herzberg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:28, 5 February 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 10:07, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Schloss Herzberg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:22, 5 February 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 10:07, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - St. Johannis Halberstadt 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 10:07, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (09 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lioconcha castrensis 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:37, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Schloss Herzberg 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 04:11, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Schloss Herzberg 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 04:11, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lioconcha castrensis (Zigzag Venus), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:53, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
•  Support Useful and used --Igor123121 (talk) 10:18, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (10 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Meretrix lusoria 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:52, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Bismarckturm Halberstadt 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 10:47, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Kloster Walkenried 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:52, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Kloster Walkenried 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 10:47, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Jagdschloss Spiegelsberge 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:42, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Bismarckturm Osterwieck 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:38, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Schloss Wernigerode 06.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Schloss Wernigerode 06.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (11 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Meretrix lusoria 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:29, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Burg Falkenstein 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:11, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Bismarckturm Opperode 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:31, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Bismarckturm Halberstadt 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:31, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Bismarckturm Osterwieck 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very tight crop on both sides, with lots of space both at top and bottom -> fixable ? --Benjism89 07:54, 6 February 2026 (UTC)  Done --Llez 08:18, 6 February 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 10:27, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lioconcha castrensis (Zigzag Venus), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:35, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:06, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Meretrix lusoria (Asian Hard Clam), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:40, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:53, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (14 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grandinenia fuchsi 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:53, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Bildungszentrum Bestehornpark Aschersleben 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:45, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Burg Falkenstein 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:45, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Wilhelm-Raabe-Warte 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:45, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Burg Falkenstein 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ROCKY 18:12, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (15 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paphia euglypta 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:21, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernigerode - Sonnenaufgang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:21, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hasseröder Ferienpark Wernigerode 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:21, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernigerode - Kochstraße 45 - Fenster 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:21, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Grandinenia fuchsi ssp. pygmaea, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:52, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:05, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (16 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neues Palais Potsdam - Statue mit Laterne 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:46, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neues Palais Potsdam - Drei Grazien 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:46, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neues Palais Potsdam - Communs 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:46, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Paphia euglypta (Well-carved Venus), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 08:23, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:45, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Set Promoted to FP

• 
  Lioconcha castrensis 01
• 
  Lioconcha castrensis 02

★ This set has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The set Lioconcha castrensis (Zigzag Venus), that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Lioconcha castrensis (Zigzag Venus), has been promoted. Thank you very much for your contribution! If you would like to nominate another image or set of images, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:10, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (17 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tapes platyptycha 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:30, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Park Sanssouci Potsdam - Antikentempel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:32, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neues Palais Potsdam - Nordflügel Gartenseite 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:32, 14 February 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 08:46, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neues Palais Potsdam - Apollon mit Merkur 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:32, 14 February 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 08:51, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neues Palais Potsdam - Antinoos 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:25, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (18 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tapes platyptycha 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 09:38, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Park Sanssouci Potsdam - Jubiläumsterrasse 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 09:38, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Paphia euglypta (Well-carved Venus), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:13, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (19 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tapes literatus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 13:51, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Park Sanssouci Potsdam - Neue Kammern 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:46, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Park Sanssouci Potsdam - Neue Kammern 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 12:18, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Park Sanssouci Potsdam - Dreifuß 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 10:56, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tapes platyptycha, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:21, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:59, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Azorinus chamasolen, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:44, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:01, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (20 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tapes literatus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:43, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Park Sanssouci Potsdam - Historische Mühle 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but more distance would have been better --Michielverbeek 06:44, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Park Sanssouci Potsdam - Historische Mühle 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Underexposed, and CAs on the top-right wing --Benjism89 07:03, 17 February 2026 (UTC)  Done --Llez 08:59, 17 February 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 18:47, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Park Sanssouci Potsdam - Historische Mühle 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments CAs --Benjism89 07:03, 17 February 2026 (UTC)  Done --Llez 08:59, 17 February 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 18:47, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Park Sanssouci Potsdam - Neue Kammern 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:43, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Codakia orbicularis (American Tiger Lucina), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:34, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tapes platyptycha, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used --Pierre André ^(talk) 11:43, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (21 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Meretrix meretrix 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:23, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Sanssouci Potsdam 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:22, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Sanssouci Potsdam 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:22, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Sanssouci Potsdam 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:22, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Park Sanssouci Potsdam - Gitterpavillon 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:22, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tapes literatus (Lettered Venus), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:57, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:48, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tapes literatus (Lettered Venus), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:04, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:41, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (22 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Meretrix meretrix 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:14, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Sanssouci Potsdam - Weinbergterrasse 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:41, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Sanssouci Potsdam 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 06:42, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Sanssouci Potsdam 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 06:42, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Sanssouci Potsdam 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 06:42, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Park Sanssouci Potsdam - Gartenvase 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality is fine but I'd expect a more specific cat --Poco a poco 11:01, 16 February 2026 (UTC)  Done I added a further category, so that we have here the same categorizations as in the other pictures of the same vase at Commons --Llez 12:44, 16 February 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:44, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Meretrix meretrix, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:26, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:10, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Meretrix meretrix, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:22, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:27, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (24 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scutarcopagia linguafelis 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:26, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Sanssouci Potsdam - Brunnenwand mit Euterpe 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:26, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (25 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scutarcopagia linguafelis 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:46, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Park Sanssouci Potsdam - Orangerieschloss 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Scutarcopagia linguafelis (Cat’s Tongue Tellin), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:54, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Gower (talk) 17:52, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (26 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paphia euglypta 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:31, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neues Palais Potsdam - Gartensalon 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:32, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Rappbode-Talsperre - Titan RT 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rappbode-Talsperre - Titan RT 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (27 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scrobicularia plana 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:31, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Scutarcopagia linguafelis (Cat’s Tongue Tellin), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Usefull and used --Ercé (talk) 07:55, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:59, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (28 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scrobicularia plana 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:34, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 28 February 2026 (UTC)