User talk:Engelberthumperdink

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Engelberthumperdink!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 13:21, 21 November 2013 (UTC) Reply

File:Rudolf Nureyev monument (2019-11-05) 01.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Rudolf Nureyev monument (2019-11-05) 01.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Rudolf Nureyev monument

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

2A02:A31A:C33F:2E80:B1FB:8C2E:61FB:A9E7 19:01, 8 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Andrei Tupolev monument, Kazan (2023-05-12) 07.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Andrei Tupolev monument, Kazan (2023-05-12) 07.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Andrei Tupolev monument, Kazan (2023-05-12) 0…

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

2A02:A31A:C33F:2E80:B1FB:8C2E:61FB:A9E7 19:33, 8 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Andrei Tupolev monument, Kazan (2023-05-12) 05.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Andrei Tupolev monument, Kazan (2023-05-12) 05.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Andrei Tupolev monument, Kazan (2023-05-12) 0…

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

2A02:A31A:C33F:2E80:B1FB:8C2E:61FB:A9E7 19:33, 8 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Philanthropist monument, Kazan (2022-07-05) 06.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Philanthropist monument, Kazan (2022-07-05) 06.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Monument to the Philanthropist (Kazan)

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

2A02:A31A:C33F:2E80:B1FB:8C2E:61FB:A9E7 01:19, 9 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Lenin monument (Freedom Square, Kazan)

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

2A02:A31A:C33F:2E80:B1FB:8C2E:61FB:A9E7 02:03, 9 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Заслуженный машиностроитель Российской Федерации (нагрудный знак).png

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Заслуженный машиностроитель Российской Федерации (нагрудный знак).png has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Заслуженный машиностроитель Российской Федера…

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:26, 9 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Andrei Tupolev monument (Kazan)

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

2A02:A31A:C33F:2E80:9CAB:EBDA:1B19:7568 17:25, 16 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Lenin monument (Freedom Square, Kazan)

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

2A02:A31A:C33F:2E80:402:9F00:7037:1C61 11:03, 5 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Опознание персоналий

Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Привет, Вячеслав! У меня к тебе есть просьба по опознанию персоналий Первого канала ввиду того, что я за последние полгода я загрузил на Викисклад более полутысячи изображений по следующим категориям:

Как известно же, работа предстоит довольно кропотливая, так как позднее можно проиллюстрировать многие статьи о российских телеперсоналиях. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 18:18, 6 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Привет! А я-то откуда должен знать их? ) Engelberthumperdink (talk) 00:08, 7 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Например, если человека вы хорошо узнаёте в лицо или по имени, или например часто видели их по телевизору. Однако в таких ситуациях целесообразнее обращаться на форумы Википедии и Викисклада. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 05:40, 7 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Maguba Syrtlanova awards (2022-03-01) 02.jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago9 comments3 people in discussion

File:Maguba Syrtlanova awards (2022-03-01) 02.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Maguba Syrtlanova awards (2022-03-01) 02.jpg

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Kursant504 (talk) 11:08, 7 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Здравствуйте, коллега. Чем возмущаться в ДР имейте ввиду, что загруженные вами фото мемориальных досок Героев СССР/России - тоже не свободные, т.к. у нас в России нет свободы панорамы (FoP) и они охраняются АП. Я не буду ставить их на удаление, но вы должны быть готовы, что их рано или поздно удалят другие пользователи. С ув. Kursant504 (talk) 13:02, 7 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Удаляйте всё, на здоровье. Engelberthumperdink (talk) 18:00, 7 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Ну обижаться только не надо. Я нормально вам говорю, как есть. Это законы РФ, тут без всякого. Kursant504 (talk) 04:11, 8 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Это законы РФ, тут без всякого" - законы РФ о дискредитации армии тоже будете соблюдать в Википедии? Engelberthumperdink (talk) 06:54, 8 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Ну так то вики в России штрафуют по КД. Видимо в конце этого пути будет блокировка рувики. А викисклад удобный ресурс с хорошими (в плане обоснованности нахождения в общественном достоянии) свободными фото. Их используют и русские ресурсы типу аналогов википедии. Kursant504 (talk) 07:29, 8 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Вам до сих пор вознаграждается вклад "по тематике СВО на Украине"? Engelberthumperdink (talk) 07:32, 8 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Engelberthumperdink. Morning, sorry to find that you are trolled by this user. IMO, if the Deletion request didn't have a consensus, then nothing need to be removed from that photo. Kursant504 has nominated lots of PD photos of Ukraine and been refuted again and again. I've reported them to Commons:AN/U for further discussion, you may want to have a look. Lemonaka (talk) 23:13, 8 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! Engelberthumperdink (talk) 11:00, 9 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Tatarstan photographs taken on XXXX-XX-XX

Latest comment: 2 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

Привет! Вы не могли бы распределять фотографии Татарстана по дням, как это сделано с Москвой и Санкт-Петербургом? MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 14:15, 17 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Привет! А зачем нужна такая категоризация в принципе? --Engelberthumperdink (talk) 18:50, 17 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Она предназначена для разгрузки основной Russia photographs taken on XXXX-XX-XX. Так например, фотографии в категории Germany photographs taken on XXXX-XX-XX распределены по федеральным землям. В целом же эти фотографии указывают на то, какого числа они сделаны и в каком субъекте Российской Федерации. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 19:19, 17 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Engelberthumperdink: Прежде чем всё это создавать, имей в виду, что категоризационный улучшайзинг = бездонная бочка. Сегодня тебя просят создавать "дневные" категории по регионам, завтра им этого уже будет мало и нужно будет категоризировать по городам, а послезавтра -- по улицам или отдельным зданиям, так что дальновиднее было бы игнорировать этих товарищей уже сейчас. --A.Savin 09:10, 20 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Вот поэтому я и спросил зачем это надо, потому что это бессмысленно, на мой взгляд. Engelberthumperdink (talk) 10:50, 20 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Фотографии с tatarstan.ru

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Добрый вечер, Вячеслав! Продолжаю тему, однако у меня есть конкретика - помочь опознать фотографии, загруженные мною с официальных сайтов Татарстана (в основном с сайта госсоветника Минтимера Шаймиева из-за исторической значимости):

MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 18:52, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Photographs by Mikhail Kozlovsky

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Добрый вечер! Ты бы не мог сюда добавлять фотографии, сделанные фотографом Минтимера Шаймиева Михаилом Козловским? Ещё также у меня просьба дополнить элемент в Викиданных по этой теме. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 20:43, 2 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Хорошо! --Engelberthumperdink (talk) 22:13, 2 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:KGB note, 1979, Sakharov (1).jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:KGB note, 1979, Sakharov (1).jpg has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:KGB note, 1979, Sakharov (1).jpg

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

PereslavlFoto (talk) 22:06, 5 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Старый сайт Госсовета Татарстана

Latest comment: 2 years ago10 comments2 people in discussion

Две недели назад состоялось пятилетие перевода официальных сайтов Республики Татарстан на лицензию CC BY 4.0. При этом сайт Госсовета республики в октябре 2019 года переехал на новый адрес, а самые ранние фотоматериалы датированы сентябрём 2019 года. Вы бы не могли отправить письмо за разъяснениями по распространению лицензии Creative Commons на старую версию сайта? Russian Rocky в июле 2018 года получил аналогичное разрешение на материалы старой версии сайта Госдумы. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 20:21, 14 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Отправил. --Engelberthumperdink (talk) 11:03, 25 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Engelberthumperdink Будете ли вы ответное письмо не только высылать в VRTS, но и публиковать на Викискладе? Это же касается сайта председателя Госсовета Фарида Мухаметшина и архивной версии сервера 1997-2011 годов - здесь могут найтись исторические сокровища, которые очень нужны Викискладу. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 18:29, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Ничего не пришло. Engelberthumperdink (talk) 18:54, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Engelberthumperdink UPD Вам подтвержающее письмо до сих пор не пришло, хотя электронные обращения рассматриваются довольно быстро? MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 20:39, 20 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Обращения зарегистрированы, ответа пока нет. Не нужно написывать постоянно сюда, когда придёт - тогда сообщу. Engelberthumperdink (talk) 13:04, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

В Госсовете отказали. Engelberthumperdink (talk) 11:09, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Engelberthumperdink Вы бы не могли выложить ответ от Госсовета на Викисклад в качестве аргумента по авторским правам? Четыре года назад на форуме русской Википедии также шла дискуссия о доменах mos.ru, которые в свою же очередь имеют исключения - сайт duma.mos.ru полностью запрещает использование материалов в коммерческих целях.

Кроме того, в начале месяца мне пришло письмо от замгубернатора Брянской области, в котором подчёркивается, что переводить официальный сайт правительства региона на свободную лицензию в ближайшее время не планируют. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 18:31, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mavrina_letter_(2023-10-27).pdf Engelberthumperdink (talk) 21:10, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Engelberthumperdink Благодарю Вас. Так что увы и ах, будем ждать переноса материалов старой версии сайта на новую. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 06:54, 28 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

WLM 2023

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Привет! Вы бы не могли проставлять шаблоны конкурса Вики любит памятники к собственным фотографиям ОКН России до 30 сентября? MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 09:56, 25 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Это слишком муторно вручную проставлять два шаблона и одну категорию в уже загруженные фотографии, которых порядка сотни. Engelberthumperdink (talk) 12:34, 25 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Archangelskoe cemetery, Kazan (2021-09-19) 41.jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Archangelskoe cemetery, Kazan (2021-09-19) 41.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Archangelskoe cemetery, Kazan (2021-09-19) 41…

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

QazyQazyQazaqstan (talk) 20:54, 22 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Russia stamp 1999 № 541.jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Russia stamp 1999 № 541.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Russia stamp 1999 № 541.jpg

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 10:30, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Images from the National Library of the Republic of Tatarstan

Latest comment: 2 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Добрый вечер! Поздравляю Вас с Днём народного единства и хочу пожелать Вам самого наилучшего в нашей стране России! Однако у меня к вам есть просьба - собрать в данную категорию все изображения из фондов Национальной библиотеки Республики Татарстан, которые вы публикуете на Викискладе, а также от других пользователей. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 18:47, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Приветствую! В смысле - из фондов? Engelberthumperdink (talk) 19:35, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Да, как раз и из фондов, и с сайта библиотеки (только те, которые перешли в общественное достояние). MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 06:36, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Они только оцифровали фотографии из книг, которые у них хранятся. С таким же успехом это мог сделать любой обладатель книги. Engelberthumperdink (talk) 13:01, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Тогда оцифрованные фотографии из книг тоже подойдут для категории. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 17:30, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Готово, впрочем вы и сами могли это сделать с помощью автомата по категоризации. Engelberthumperdink (talk) 18:10, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

ru:Проект:Тематическая неделя русскоязычных регионов мира/Неделя Татарстана

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Чуть не забыл, но есть важная новость - до 1 декабря в русской Википедии проводится неделя Татарстана, в ходе которой будут написаны и улучшены статьи о данном российском регионе. Вы не можете поучаствовать в ней, учитывая ваш огромный фотографический и статейный вклад в тематику республики? MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Uploads by MasterRus21thCentury/Tatarstan.ru

Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Добрый день! Вы бы не могли добавить фотографии периода 2002-2004 годов с сайта Госсоветника Татарстана в статьи русской Википедии? Например, это долгожданные свободные иллюстрации Мустая Карима, Баки Урманче, Наки Исанбета, Альфии Авлазовой, Фарида Сейфуля-Мулюкова, Владислава Казенина и других, не забыв также удалить несвободные иллюстрации из РВП. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 09:19, 26 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Добрый! А вы в Википедии заблокированы что-ли? Engelberthumperdink (talk) 09:23, 26 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Да, уже как 2,5 года. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 10:52, 26 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Награждённые наградами Татарстана без свободных иллюстраций

Latest comment: 2 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Добрый вечер! У меня к Вам просьба найти свободные иллюстрации к следующим персоналиям. Все они награждены медалями и орденами Татарстана. В обозримом будущем найду и тех, по которым можно найти среди награждённых юбилейной медалью "В память 1000-летия Казани".

Медаль ордена "За заслуги перед Республикой Татарстан":

Билялов, Тимур Рафаилович
Воронков, Дмитрий Сергеевич
Галимуллин, Фоат Галимуллинович
Гиниятуллин, Рим Абдулович
Зеленов, Николай Александрович
Зерцалов, Геннадий Иванович
Зубарев, Вячеслав Викторович - нужна категория на Викискладе
Каргинов, Андрей Олегович
Красильников, Дмитрий Михайлович - нужно создать категорию
Муравьёв, Владимир Юрьевич
Мухаметшин, Рафик Мухаметшович - на странице изображение РИА Новостей о визите Дмитрия Медведева 12 ноября 2007 года, нужно портретное фото.
Николаев, Эдуард Валентинович - нет категории
Нуриев, Марат Абдулхаевич - фото с сомнительным правовым статусом
Попова, Ирина Фёдоровна - нужна категория на Викискладе
Прытков, Геннадий Николаевич

Орден "Дуслык":

Кадыров, Адам Рамзанович
Муллашев, Камиль Валиахмедович
Николаев, Эдуард Валентинович - нет категории на Викискладе
Никонова, Валентина Геннадьевна
Сабитов, Рифат Абдулвагапович - нет категории
Сагдеев, Ренад Зиннурович - на изображении поставить шаблон дубликата на Commons
Сираева, Савия Гимадлисламовна
Сотников, Дмитрий Сергеевич - буду искать портретное фото
Тахаутдинов, Шафагат Фахразович - в ближайшее время найду современное фото и создам категорию на Викискладе
Хабриев, Рамил Усманович - скоро будет категория
Хайрудинов, Сергей Рафикович
Шутиков, Анатолий Иванович

MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 15:44, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

И что вы насовали сюда кучу тех, фотографии которых есть на Викискладе? Более того, ряд из них я лично фоткал. Engelberthumperdink (talk) 14:43, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Engelberthumperdink Дело в том, что я выполняю трудоёмкую работу над тем, чтобы было легче следить за теми, кто награждён наградами. Тем более это автоматическая простановка категорий, если же импортировать данные из карточки Википедии в Викиданные. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 16:43, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Целенаправленно я искать не буду. У меня и своих фотографий куча не загружена, а тут вы ещё предлагаете тратить время и грузить другие. Если случайно наткнусь — загружу. Engelberthumperdink (talk) 19:45, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Окей! MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 20:45, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Фотографии Михаила Козловского

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Добрый вечер! В марте наступающего года исполнилось бы 70 лет личному фотографу Минтимера Шаймиева Михаилу Борисовичу Козловскому. Он сделал немало исторических фотографий, в том числе и президентов России (так например, ему принадлежит знаменитое фото Бориса Ельцина, где она разбивает глиняный горшок с завязанными глазами). При этом на официальных сайтах Татарстана, лицензированных по CC BY 4.0, доступны лишь материалы с середины 1990-х годов по декабрь 2017 года, если считать сайт самого Минтимера Шариповича. Сам же Михаил Борисович начал снимать в конце 1970-х годов для газеты "Советская Татария" и его снимки 1980-х годов будут очень ценными, учитывая то, что это переломный момент в истории советского государства.

Вы бы не подумали насчёт получения разрешения на публикацию от его сыновей Эмиля и Леонида под одной из лицензий Creative Commons? Так например, Дмитрий Львович Медведев в прошлом году через VRTS отправил разрешение на публикацию фотографий его отца Льва Леонидовича, многие из которых имеют высокое разрешение и используются в статьях Википедии. Так например, благодаря этому Викисклад обзавёлся свободными фотографиями кумиров наших родителей - Игоря Талькова, Джуны Давидашвили, а также ряда общественных деятелей конца 20 века - спортсменов, политиков, артистов и т.д., причём в высоком разрешении, что их очень удобно смотреть на больших компьютерах. В свою же очередь, разрешение стоит распространить и на его книги «Борис Ельцин и Татарстан», «Владимир Путин и Татарстан», «Минтимер Шаймиев и Татарстан», «Дмитрий Медведев и Татарстан», «Миг откровения». MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 18:02, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Так напишите сами, если у вас есть их контакты. Я со службой OTRS больше контактировать не собираюсь. Engelberthumperdink (talk) 18:29, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:2008 Kazan gas explosion

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Добрый вечер! В английской Википедии есть статья о взрыве бытового газа в Казани в ночь на 9 января 2008 года, в результате которого 8 человек погибли. Сейчас я заливаю фотографии данного происшествия и в связи с этим хочу задать вопрос - подходит ли потенциальная статья по критериям значимости? MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 19:33, 24 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Минтимер Шарипович Шаймиев

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Добрый день! Поздравляю Вас с наступившим Годом Дракона! У меня к тебе есть предложение наполнить галерею о госсоветнике Татарстана Минтимере Шаймиеве, поскольку его один из официальных портретов 2019 года выдвинут на статус ценной иллюстрации. Здесь материала уйма, учитывая то, что РИА Новости 12 лет назад предоставило весьма неплохой фотоматериал, а портретная фотография Максима Богодвида от 20 мая 2009 года является самой полезной. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 10:05, 3 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Категоризация

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Добрый вечер! Вы бы не могли помочь со свободными изображениями для следующих персоналий: ~~# Зеленов, Николай Александрович~~

~~# Магдеев, Наиль Гамбарович — Википедия~~ ~~# Category:Jaudat Fayzrakhmanov — Wikimedia Commons~~

MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 18:10, 20 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:January 2007 in Turin

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Привет! Ты не помог бы мне с опознанием локаций Турина и членов официальной делегации на презентации казанской заявки на летнюю Универсиаду-2011 11-15 января 2007 года? MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 14:10, 21 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Не знаю этих людей, а Турин уж тем более. --Engelberthumperdink (talk) 21:57, 21 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Shock-worker construction KamAZ.png

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ polski ∙

português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ slovenščina ∙ ไทย ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Shock-worker construction KamAZ.png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Quick1984 (talk) 05:35, 26 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Volkhov Front badge.png

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ polski ∙

português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ slovenščina ∙ ไทย ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Volkhov Front badge.png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Quick1984 (talk) 05:47, 3 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Volkhov Front badge (2024-02-15).jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ polski ∙

português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ slovenščina ∙ ไทย ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Volkhov Front badge (2024-02-15).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Yours sincerely, Quick1984 (talk) 05:52, 3 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Shock-worker construction KamAZ (badge).png

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ polski ∙

português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ slovenščina ∙ ไทย ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Shock-worker construction KamAZ (badge).png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Quick1984 (talk) 05:56, 3 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Kazanskiy almanah (2023-12-22).jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ polski ∙

português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ slovenščina ∙ ไทย ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Kazanskiy almanah (2023-12-22).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Quick1984 (talk) 05:57, 3 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Engelberthumperdink

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Birthday of Musa Dzhalil (2024-02-15) 21.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Quick1984 (talk) 06:04, 3 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:Order of Karl Marx (1974).jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

File:Order of Karl Marx (1974).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Not PD. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Order of Karl Marx.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

– Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 15:30, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Изображение ордена, напечатанное на наградной грамоте ГДР, не охраняется авторским правом, поскольку это государственный документ. Engelberthumperdink (talk) 15:34, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:Order of Karl Marx (1974).jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Order of Karl Marx (1974).jpg has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Order of Karl Marx (1974).jpg

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

– Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 13:27, 10 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:Tatar State Opera and Ballet Theatre (2022-05-22) 02.jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Tatar State Opera and Ballet Theatre (2022-05-22) 02.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tatar State Opera and Ballet Theatre (2022-05…

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 03:20, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

w:ru:Гранберг, Александр Григорьевич

Latest comment: 2 years ago7 comments2 people in discussion

Доброе утро! Вы бы не могли удалить несвободную фотографию из статьи в связи с появлением под свободной лицензией (она с tatarstan.ru)? MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 07:13, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Привет! Готово. Engelberthumperdink (talk) 07:24, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Engelberthumperdink Ещё по возможности максимально используйте фотографии из категории Category:Uploads by MasterRus21thCentury/Tatarstan.ru, особенно 2000-х годов. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 07:54, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Engelberthumperdink Обновление к статье ru:Смагин, Леонид Максимович - File:Leonid Smagin.jpg. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 17:02, 3 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Зачем так обрезать фотографии, что даже волосы обрезали? --Engelberthumperdink (talk) 17:26, 3 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Engelberthumperdink Сейчас я перезаписал фотографию. Обрезки волос больше нету. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 07:27, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Добавил. Engelberthumperdink (talk) 08:05, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Andrei Tupolev square (Kazan)

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Lenin mural, Tupolev square, Kazan (1).jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, 『Shiro Neko』^Обг. 18:46, 28 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

COM:AN/U

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ বাংলা ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ magyar ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（中国大陆） ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#User:Engelberthumperdink. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

Quick1984 (talk) 17:55, 29 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

You have been blocked for a duration of 1 week

Latest comment: 2 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of 1 week for the following reason: insulting other users, as described at [1].

If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock|(enter your reason here) ~~~~}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. See also the block log. For more information, see Appealing a block.

العربية ∙ مصرى ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ Gaeilge ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ Simple English ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jmabel ! talk 19:17, 29 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Это очень смешно, что меня заблокировали за изображение собственной работы, за фотографию фотографии, находящейся в свободном доступе, а также за фотографию официального документа советских государственных органов. Это очень красноречиво говорит о понимании правил Викисклада и авторских прав отдельными участниками, которые мнят себя защитниками этих самых правил. Engelberthumperdink (talk) 05:13, 30 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

No, this is not what you were blocked for. You were blocked for things like addressing another editor as "Дебил". If you don't understand why that was inappropriate, then perhaps a week to think it over is too short a block. - Jmabel ! talk 05:58, 30 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Jmabel. Тогда почему отмыватели авторских прав грузят изображения чужих людей без разрешения, а потом называют меня троллем, откатывают шаблон номинации на удаление и им всё сходит с рук? Это другое? Тогда действительно, да, неделя — это слишком короткий срок для понимания этого абсурда. Жду когда вы забаните этого участника за оскорбление, в котором он ссылается на ваше решение. Фактически, вы покрываете этим решением нарушения других участников. --Engelberthumperdink (talk) 06:27, 30 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Если вы не видите того, что Quick1984 сам грузит изображения с нарушением авторских прав и одновременно занимается выискиванием нарушений у других участников, и потом бежит жаловаться к администраторам, то это ваши проблемы. Святая простота. --Engelberthumperdink (talk) 06:30, 30 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have had my own major conflicts with User:Rodrigo.Argenton, so it would not be appropriate for me to take disciplinary action toward him. I'll ask another admin to take over this case. - Jmabel ! talk 14:40, 30 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:Volkhov Front badge (2024-02-15).jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Volkhov Front badge (2024-02-15).jpg has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Volkhov Front badge (2024-02-15).jpg

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Quick1984 (talk) 19:58, 29 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:Volkhov Front badge and card (2024-02-15) 01.jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Volkhov Front badge and card (2024-02-15) 01.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Volkhov Front badge and card (2024-02-15) 01.…

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Quick1984 (talk) 19:59, 29 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Опознание персоналий на церемонии награждения

Latest comment: 2 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Добрый вечер! Я только что залил фотографии с церемонии награждения госнаград Татарстана и Российской Федерации Рустамом Миннихановым. Они в Category:December 2022 in Kazan - здесь нужна большая помощь с опознанием персоналий, особенно по тем, у которых есть статьи в Википедии. Буду благодарен Вам за любой ответ! MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 17:30, 6 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Добрый! Никого не узнал, кроме Муслимы Латыповой с фото № 5. --Engelberthumperdink (talk) 17:54, 6 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Engelberthumperdink Ещё важно обратить внимание на то, какими наградами награждены люди (особенно нужно обращать внимание на ордена России и Татарстана, такие как Дуслык и За заслуги перед Республикой Татарстан), а также пользоваться сообщениями СМИ. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 18:12, 6 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
- - Поскольку администрация президента/раиса никогда не публиковала списки награждаемых в конкретный день, определение их - очень затруднительно. В сообщениямх СМИ приводят от силы пять человек. --Engelberthumperdink (talk) 19:34, 6 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Pravda (1968-08-24) 01.jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ polski ∙

português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ slovenščina ∙ ไทย ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Pravda (1968-08-24) 01.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Quick1984 (talk) 13:58, 30 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Pravda (1968-08-22) 01.jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ polski ∙

português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ slovenščina ∙ ไทย ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Pravda (1968-08-22) 01.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Quick1984 (talk) 13:59, 30 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Muhitdin Kurbangaliev

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Muhitdin Kurbangaliev (1928).jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Quick1984 (talk) 14:19, 30 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Об архиве личника Шаймиева

Latest comment: 1 year ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Добрый вечер! В апреле вы засняли выставку к 70-летию со дня рождения уже покойного личного фотографа Минтимера Шаймиева Михаила Козловского. Здесь были показаны также снимки, которые до нынешнего момента не оцифровывались и нигде не публиковались, а также газетные вырезки и аппаратура. Вы бы не могли выйти на связь с его сыновьями Эмилем и Леонидом, чтобы те дали письменное согласие на перевод фотографий под свободную лицензию, как это сделал Дмитрий Львович Медведев в отношении своего отца? История России 1990-х годов очень слабо представлена на Викискладе, а начала 2000-х годов требует высококачественных снимков - сайт Кремля до 2015 года имел низкокачественные снимки. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 16:04, 24 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Здравствуйте! Церемония открытия выставки была закрытой, отснял потом, с сыновьями я не знаком и не знаю где их искать. Так что вот. --Engelberthumperdink (talk) 17:17, 24 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
А вот вы бы не обратились к Фархаду Фатхуллину, благодаря которому сайты Татарстана стали свободными? MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 14:29, 17 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Он тоже не знает сыновей. --Engelberthumperdink (talk) 07:51, 20 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Plaques in Kazan

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Adamyuk street 4, Kazan (2021-10-01) 02.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Quick1984 (talk) 03:37, 17 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Сайт Ильсура Метшина

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Добрый вечер! Планируете ли Вы серию загрузок файлов с сайта мэра Казани, учитывая ваш большой вклад в татарстанскую тематику на Викискладе? Из всех татарстанских интернет-ресурсов он первым в 2016 году перешёл на свободную лицензию, в то время как сайт мэрии и все официальные сайты Татарстана летом 2018 года, при этом мэрия Казани перешла на свободную лицензию незадолго до чемпионата мира по футболу. Архив фото- и видеоматериалов при этом с 2006 года. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 19:04, 19 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Доброе утро! У меня с апреля собственный фотоархив не разобран. С этим бы сначала разобраться. --Engelberthumperdink (talk) 03:29, 20 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Murder_of_Alexey_Navalny

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Murder of Alexey Navalny has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ македонски ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ไทย ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 吴语 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Butko (talk) 04:17, 30 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Stairs, Leninskiy garden (2021-03-19) 03.jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ polski ∙

português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ slovenščina ∙ ไทย ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Stairs, Leninskiy garden (2021-03-19) 03.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Quick1984 (talk) 11:19, 5 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Brening pharmacy interior (2020-11-03) 12.jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ polski ∙

português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ slovenščina ∙ ไทย ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Brening pharmacy interior (2020-11-03) 12.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Quick1984 (talk) 11:19, 5 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Brening pharmacy interior (2020-11-03) 10.jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ polski ∙

português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ slovenščina ∙ ไทย ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Brening pharmacy interior (2020-11-03) 10.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Quick1984 (talk) 11:20, 5 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:Brening pharmacy interior (2020-11-03) 10.jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Brening pharmacy interior (2020-11-03) 10.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Brening pharmacy interior (2020-11-03) 10.jpg

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 11:37, 5 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:Brening pharmacy interior (2020-11-03) 12.jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Brening pharmacy interior (2020-11-03) 12.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Brening pharmacy interior (2020-11-03) 12.jpg

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 11:38, 5 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Please do not remove problem tags

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ македонски ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ svenska ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Hi! It has come to my attention that you have removed a warning which says that a file doesn't have enough information about the source or license conditions. Nevertheless, it seems to me that this information is still missing and I have restored the tag. You may either add the required information or, if you think that required information is already given, put the image up for a deletion request so that it won't automatically be deleted. Thank you.

--Yann (talk) 11:38, 5 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Никаких проблем там нет. Engelberthumperdink (talk) 11:40, 5 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your account has been blocked

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

You have been blocked from editing Commons. The reason for the block is available in the block log as is the name of the administrator who blocked you. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.

Next time, it will be indefinite. --Yann (talk) 11:40, 5 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Вы разрешили участнику Quick1984 мне угрожать. Спасибо! Engelberthumperdink (talk) 11:56, 5 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:Stairs, Leninskiy garden (2021-03-19) 03.jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Stairs, Leninskiy garden (2021-03-19) 03.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Stairs, Leninskiy garden (2021-03-19) 03.jpg

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Quick1984 (talk) 11:40, 5 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Требую разблокировки

Latest comment: 1 year ago10 comments4 people in discussion

Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion.

Request reason: "Участники Yann и Quick1984 играют с правилами, требуя удаления фотографий, на которых явно использованы дореволюционные фотографии. Тут везде дореволюционные фотографии, за исключением одной, которая сооветствует Commons:De minimis. И тут тоже самое. Дореволюционные фотографии, плюс три современных фотографии, которые нельзя повторно использовать из-за низкого разрешения. И за это мне дали три месяца блокировки. Очевидно, что это месть за подачу жалобы администраторам. --Engelberthumperdink (talk) 11:53, 5 August 2024 (UTC)"Reply

Decline reason: "As referenced below, COM:BP asks an understanding of the issue and a credible commitment to discontinue. Neither are on offer. You are blocked for two issues: 1) uploading unfree files after warnings and 2) inappropriate behaviour:

Uploading unfree files after warnings - File:Stairs, Leninskiy garden (2021-03-19) 03.jpg, File:Brening pharmacy interior (2020-11-03) 12.jpg, and File:Brening pharmacy interior (2020-11-03) 10.jpg are unquestionably derivative works, and not reasonably considered de minimis. The only reason they've not been speedy deleted is the bureaucratic quirk of F3 that requires full DRs for photos in public spaces. That you offer the contrary--after a significant history of FoP/DW issues (e.g., Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Andrei Tupolev square (Kazan), Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Engelberthumperdink, etc.)--suggests you continue not understand the issue and, indeed per the responses below, do not desire to understand.
Inappropriate behaviour - while this is vague, it could certainly include removal of issue templates ([2][3][4]) without resolution of the concern, a concept about which you've been warned or, more likely, your ongoing unacceptable conduct related to other users. While I agree there is nothing rude about this (a mere appeal to scrutinise one's own opinions, at most a tinge condescending), a history like this ([5][6][7]) that has seen you warned and blocked should have made it abundantly clear that adding a blatant failure to assume good faith ("Obvious revenge") to an administrator noticeboard (!!!) would not be appropriate. Bad faith which has been repeated below (and, with the same lack of self-awareness, with the belief it would assist unblocking (!!!))

In short, the block is clearly justified. Besides copyright, Engelberthumperdink's interactions have for years been replete with whataboutisms, insults (as noted above), sarcasm (e.g., [8], [9], etc.) and a baseless superiority complex (e.g., "Я не понимаю чем именно вклад Quick1984, который вообще не делает никаких фотографий и не грузит никакие собственные фотографии в принципе, ценнее моего вклада в размере более чем 50 (!) тысяч фотографий" [10]; "Вам с четырьмя загрузками конечно же виднее. Смиренно удаляюсь" [11]; etc.) The responses below are more of the same, a complete failure to exhibit any self-awareness or responsibility, and only demonstrate the appropriateness of the block; toy-throwing [12] is particularly unpersuasive. Эlcobbola _talk 16:48, 5 August 2024 (UTC)"Reply

Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.

(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ македонски ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ Simple English ∙ svenska ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ 中文（臺灣） ∙ +/−

Oppose The issues raised by Quick1984 are genuine, so reporting Quick1984 to ANU instead of addressing them is not the solution. You were already blocked several times for various issues, but it seems you didn't get the message. Unblocking request should include an understanding of the issues which lead to a block, and a commitment not to repeat or continue them. Yann (talk) 12:02, 5 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Встречный вопрос. Вы видите у участника Quick1984 понимание проблем с теми загрузками, которые он осуществляет на протяжении долгого времени? Каким образом участник, сам нарушающий правила Викисклада, может быть моральным авторитетом в этом вопросе? Участник мне нагрубил, приплёл мою блокировку в Русской Википедии, угрожал мне блокировкой тут, и вы, вместо того чтобы прекратить эти угрозы, меня самого заблокировали. Прекрасная реакция администратора. Commons:De minimis гласит, что фотографии с использованием вторичных изображений, занимающих незначительную часть фотографии, можно грузить на Викисклад. По вашей молниеносной реакции могу предполагать что вы каким-то образом связаны c участником Quick1984. Не говоря уж о том, что у меня с этим участником давний конфликт. Так что вы вообще не имели права меня блокировать в принципе. И да, вы не потрудились объяснить каким образом фразы «Вы в очередной раз не прочитали решение Конституционного суда Российской Федерации по ссылке» и «Как вам ещё раз это объяснить?» являются грубым ответом. Формулировку «rude response» использовал Quick1984. Вы знаток русского языка? Где там грубость? Меня заблокировали за несуществующую грубость? За загрузку изображений de minimis? За убирание номинаций на удаление с этих изображений, которые расставил участник, находящийся в давнем конфликте со мной и в качестве мести на мой запрос к администраторам? Очень много вопросов. Если блокировка не будет снята, то мне нет смысла больше пребывать на Викискладе, тратить своё время на поездки по Казани и Татарстану в целях загрузки этих изображений на Викисклад. Я не понимаю чем именно вклад Quick1984, который вообще не делает никаких фотографий и не грузит никакие собственные фотографии в принципе, ценнее моего вклада в размере более чем 50 (!) тысяч фотографий. --Engelberthumperdink (talk) 12:11, 5 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Просто признай уже, что на Викисклад нельзя выкладывать изображения советских и современных российских скульптур. Ты не далее как вчера выложил вот это фото, хотя понимаешь, что это нарушает парвила. Я не понимаю, какой смысл в этом поведении. Всем будет лучше, если ты признаешь и дашь слово не загружать такой контент. Но если ты намерен продолжать в том же духе, то боюсь, что я тебе уже не смогу ничем помочь. --A.Savin 15:05, 5 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

А скульптура в этом конкретном случае тут причём? Вообще, ты тоже рассуждаешь странно. Вот, например, я не рассчитываю дожить до 2107 года. Если я сейчас не загружу какие-либо сделанные мной же изображения, то срок их загрузки сдвигается на 70 лет плюс от моей смерти. Я сомневаюсь, что кто-то будет заниматься разбором моего фотоархива, поэтому я гружу всё что сфотографировал. Вопрос тогда зачем существует категория для восстановления изображений в 2107 году и аналогичные категории по другим годам, а? Почему я не могу загрузить фото мемориальной доски? В моих действиях и загрузках есть логика. Это фиксация наследия. Эту доску уже уничтожили. Наверное, для Викисклада лучше загрузить фото, которое удалят и через 70 лет восстановят, чем вообще полное отсутствие фотографий уничтоженного объекта. Нет? Тогда давайте создавать закрытый для других проект, в который можно будет грузить пока неразрешённые для загрузки на Викисклад фотографии. --Engelberthumperdink (talk) 15:16, 5 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Ну так если ты потому их выкладываешь, что типа пусть их пока удаляют чтобы когда-нибудь лет через сто восстановить, тогда и логично было бы изначально не лезть на рожон, а просто не обращать внимание на то, что твои загрузки время от времени кто-то номинирует на удаление... --A.Savin 16:19, 5 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Тут мой вклад уже назвали незначительным, так что мне действительно тут делать больше нечего. Если никто, абсолютно никто не фотографирует татарстанских художников и писателей, то почему я должен это делать, если здесь это никому не сдалось. --Engelberthumperdink (talk) 17:03, 5 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

@elcobbola. Спасибо что назвали («baseless superiority complex») наполнение Викисклада фотографиями татарстанских персоналий, достопримечательностей Казани и Татарстана — не заслуживающим ценности. --Engelberthumperdink (talk) 17:03, 5 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

I called your implicit belief that you are superior or entitled to different treatment by virtue of upload count to be a "baseless superiority complex"; it has nothing to do with Tatarstan personalities, Kazan and Tatarstan landmarks as I'm sure you, who so routinely remark on others' intellegence, in fact understand. I've removed talk page access per this (undoing it later does not excuse it being done in the first place) and the continued sarcasm, bad faith, failure to get the point, and ongoing demonstration by your remarks that there is no desire to address the issues and no reason to believe an appropriate response will be forthcoming (verily, "так что мне действительно тут делать больше нечего"). Эlcobbola _talk 17:20, 5 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Gabdulla Tukay monument (Kazan, …

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Gabdulla Tukay monument (2020-02-04) 01.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 04:47, 8 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Karakuz

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Karakuz (2023-03-27) 01.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Quick1984 (talk) 05:56, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Lenin monument (Kopylov Street, …

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Kopylov street, Kazan (2021-09-17) 01.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 04:57, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Lenin monument in Krylya Sovetov…

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Krylya Sovetov park, Kazan (2021-09-17) 33.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 05:00, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Stamps by Alexander Osolin

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Russia stamp 2004 № 949.jpg

And also:

File:Russia stamp 2004 № 949list.jpg

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 09:44, 12 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:Clara Zetkin Street, Kazan (2021-05-06) 03.jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Clara Zetkin Street, Kazan (2021-05-06) 03.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Clara Zetkin Street, Kazan (2021-05-06) 03.jp…

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 06:42, 2 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:Clara Zetkin Street, Kazan (2021-05-06) 01.jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Clara Zetkin Street, Kazan (2021-05-06) 01.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Clara Zetkin Street, Kazan (2021-05-06) 01.jp…

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 06:42, 2 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:Art City (2021-10-05) 09.jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Art City (2021-10-05) 09.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Art City (2021-10-05) 09.jpg

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 04:16, 3 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Gabdulla Tukay monument (New Kyr…

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Gabdulla Tukay monument, New Kyrlai (2024-03-28) 01.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 07:15, 24 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Gabdulla Tukay monument (New Kyr…

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Gabdulla Tukay monument, New Kyrlai (2024-03-28) 01.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 07:16, 24 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Musa Dzhalil bust (Kazan)

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Musa Dzhalil bust, Kazan (2021-09-17) 02.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 07:30, 24 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Baki Urmanche

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Works of Baki Urmanche in Hazine (2021-05-15) 01.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 07:34, 24 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Загрузки с сайтов Татарстана

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Вячеслав, поздравляю Вас с возвращением! Планируете ли Вы большой залив материалов не только собственного изготовления, но и с татарстанских сайтов? В плане персоналий нужно ориентироваться на умерших персоналий - к ним ещё можно подобрать свободные иллюстрации. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 20:35, 11 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Привет! Спасибо! У меня с апреля ничего не разобрано, там было вручение премии Тукая, например. Engelberthumperdink (talk) 07:31, 12 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:National culture centre after reconstruction (Kazan)

Latest comment: 1 year ago6 comments2 people in discussion

По-моему в её надкатегории все фото - тоже афтер реконстракшен. Я сталкивался с такой же проблемой и решил, что её нужно решать иначе - текущий вид здания класть в категорию без уточнений, а предыдущие - в подкатегории "before reconstruction" и "during reconstruction", предлагаю здесь сделать так же. MBH 11:33, 11 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Ну так сейчас-то это здание к НКЦ вообще никакого отношения не имеет. См. корабль Тесея. Engelberthumperdink (talk) 04:33, 12 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Это не имеет отношения к поднятому мной вопросу. Можно переименовать в библиотеку (я бы сразу назвал библиотекой, если бы категория уже не была создана), я могу это сделать ботом, проблем нет - вопрос не в этом, а в том, нафига иметь подкатегорию "афтер реконстракшен", если все без исключения фото объекта - афтер реконстракшен, других нет, и почти все новые тоже будут такими. MBH 05:34, 12 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Как раз таки имеет отношение, потому что здание НБ РТ не имеет никакого отношения к НКЦ, это разные сущности. Жаль, что ты не понимаешь также разницы между учреждением и зданием, которое оно занимает. Engelberthumperdink (talk) 05:59, 12 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Я тебя не понимаю. Ещё раз, какие аргументы против того, чтобы перенести всё из категории "афтер реконстракшен" на уровень выше, вне зависимости от того, как назвать эту категорию уровнем выше? Название можем и старое оставить, и сменить на "библиотеку". MBH 07:27, 12 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Я вообще не вижу поводов к тому, чтобы что-то менять. Engelberthumperdink (talk) 07:56, 12 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Museum of Konstantin Vasilyev (K…

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Museum of Konstantin Vasilyev, Kazan (2019-09-27) 01.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Quick1984 (talk) 10:35, 25 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Derzhavin Prize

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Derzhavin Prize (2022-07-14) 01.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Krd 17:36, 28 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Grave of Rustem Yakhin (2021-10-11) 04.jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Grave of Rustem Yakhin (2021-10-11) 04.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Grave of Rustem Yakhin (2021-10-11) 04.jpg

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

CitationAuditor (talk) 14:53, 31 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Please change your username

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons. I noticed that your username, "Engelberthumperdink", may not meet Commons' username policy because Engelbert Humperdinck. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing this form, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. Donnermar2 (talk) 17:33, 5 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Я на Викискладе с 2013 года и никогда не возникало претензий по поводу никнейма, и я думаю, что меня трудно спустать с умершим прусским композитором. Engelberthumperdink (talk) 17:38, 5 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Жанна Богородицкая Китри в полете.jpeg

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Жанна Богородицкая Китри в полете.jpeg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: KULIKOVFOTO in EXIF

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Quick1984 (talk) 11:27, 12 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Victory park Kazan 2018-05-09 (35).jpg

Latest comment: 11 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Victory park Kazan 2018-05-09 (35).jpg has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Victory park Kazan 2018-05-09 (35).jpg

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:56, 30 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 10 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Aleksandr Pushkin monument (Push…

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Pushkin monument, Pushkin street, Kazan (2019-11-05) 01.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:59, 31 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Blocked

Latest comment: 10 months ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Template:Indefblockeduser/layout --Bedivere (talk) 14:10, 31 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Bedivere: мой вклад в развитие казанской/татарстанской тематики на Викискладе в размере 57 тысяч загруженных фотографий за 12 лет не имеет значения, я правильно понимаю? Вы ссылаетесь на то, что меня блокировали шесть раз, но последняя блокировка была в августе прошлого года, и с тех по не было никаких претензий. Из-за той блокировки я потерял фотографии из викиконференции в Стамбуле и Тбилиси, которые не смог загрузить вовремя, а потом моя карта памяти сломалась. Сейчас вы хотите чтобы Викисклад потерял другие мои фотографии за прошлый год из второй викиконференции в Стамбуле? --Engelberthumperdink (talk) 14:50, 31 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Template:Unblock granted

Блокировка может быть снята, если участник понимает причины блокировки и если мы можем быть уверены, что это не повторяется. Пока здесь ни то, ни другого. Попробуйте ещё раз. Taivo (talk) 18:00, 31 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Я понимаю, что согласно текущей политике Викисклада сюда нельзя грузить произведения авторов, которые умерли менее чем 70+ лет назад, и на которые не распространяется свобода панорамы согласно Гражданскому кодексу РФ. Тем не менее, я загружал такого рода фотографии, потому что считаю это вкладом в сохранение исторической памяти о происходящих событиях и вещах как недавнего прошлого, так и современности. Когда-нибудь эти загруженные файлы восстановят, когда срок авторских прав истечёт, но тогда пока не будет свободных фотографий нашего времени, кроме тех, которые были сделаны сейчас мною, например. Потому что викискладовцев-авторов собственных фотографий из Татарстана тут можно посчитать по пальцам одной руки.Тем не менее, я более не буду грузить такие фотографии таких произведений, чтобы не порождать конфликтов, как по поводу авторского права, так и с другими участниками Викисклада в принципе. Прошу меня разблокировать, потому что мне больше некуда идти, негде делиться фотографиями Казани и Татарстана, например, исторических зданий. Викисклад, а до того Википедия, это огромный кусок моей жизни. Прошу не лишать меня этого. Мне больше некуда идти со своим фотографически-краеведческим трудом и больше негде самореализовываться. --Engelberthumperdink (talk) 09:18, 1 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Просьба от 6 сентября 2025

Latest comment: 10 months ago7 comments2 people in discussion

Коллега, здравствуйте! Ужасно сожалею, что вас заблокировали на Викискладе. Жду вашей скорой разблокировки (если не уже). Не могли бы вы, пожалуйста, сфотографировать могилу четырёх лётчиков на Арском кладбище Казани, которые погибли из-за катастрофы самолёта ТБ-7 в 1941 году? Фотография их могилы: фото. Между могилами лётчиков — памятник постороннему человеку, это нормально. Сейчас не в Казани и вообще не рядом, в ближайшее время сам фотографию сделать и залить на Викисклад не смогу. Буду очень благодарен, если вы сфотографируете и сюда выложите. Горизонт событий (talk) 03:02, 6 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Добрый день! Срок блокировки скостили до 1 декабря. Учитывая из-за чего тут весь сыр-бор, когда российские участники массово вычищают фотографии российских же участников, навряд ли фото таких надгробных памятников долго просуществует на Викискладе... Особенно, что там гравировка с лицами. Engelberthumperdink (talk) 13:12, 6 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

А жаль, хотя на Коммонс есть целая категория с этим кладбищем. Всё равно спасибо. Горизонт событий (talk) 16:50, 6 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Спасибо, что спалили контору ) --Engelberthumperdink (talk) 22:31, 6 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

А это секрет Полишинеля: для большинства кладбищ мира созданы категории на Викискладе. Кстати, я тут подумал насчёт гравировок с лицами: они же подпадают под Template:T. Горизонт событий (talk) 22:36, 6 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Вы думаете я не спорил тут на этот счёт? Спорил. Понаудаляли. Engelberthumperdink ([[User talk:Engelberthumperdink#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:45, 6 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Грустно! Горизонт событий ([[User talk:Горизонт событий|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:47, 6 September 2025 (UTC)Reply