Jump to content

Cadidatas a imaxes de calidade

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
This page is a translated version of a page Commons:Quality images candidates and the translation is 47% complete. Changes to the translation template, respectively the source language can be submitted through Commons:Quality images candidates and have to be approved by a translation administrator.
Shortcut
↓ Salta a nomeamentos ↓
Other languages:

Estas son as candidatas para converterse en imaxes de calidade. Por favor, que quede claro que non é o mesmo que as imaxes destacadas. Ademais, se queres obter información sobre as túas imaxes podes conseguila en Críticas fotográficas.

Propósito

O propósito das imaxes de calidade é animar ás persoas que son a base de Commons, aos usuarios individuais que proporcionan as imaxes únicas que expanden esta colección. Mentres que imaxes destacadas identifican as mellores imaxes subidas a Commons, imaxes de calidade serve para identificar animar a que os usuarios se esforcen para proporcionar imaxes de calidade Commons. Ademais, as imaxes de calidade pode ser un lugar onde outros usuarios expliquen métodos para mellorar unha imaxe.

Directrices

Todas as imaxes nomeadas deben estar creadas por usuarios de Commons.

Para os nomeadores

Debaixo están as directrices xerais para Imaxes de calidade; criterios máis detallados están dispoñibles en Directrices de imaxes.

Requisitos das imaxes

  1. Copyright status. Quality image candidates have to be uploaded to Commons under a suitable license. The full license requirements are at Commons:Copyright tags.
  2. As imaxes deben estar en conformidade coas todas políticas e prácticas de Commons, incluído Commons:Photographs of identifiable people.
  3. As imaxes de calidade deben ter un nome de ficheiro significativo, estar axeitadamente categorizadas e ter unha descrición precisa na páxina do arquivo nunha ou máis linguas. É preferible, pero non obrigatorio, incluír unha descrición en inglés.
  4. Sen anuncios ou sinaturas na imaxe. Os dereitos de autor e información da autoría das imaxes de calidade deben atoparse na páxina do ficheiro e poden estar nos metadatos da imaxe, pero non interferir co contido da mesma.

Creador
Proposed wording changes to specifically exclude AI generate media from being eligable for QI see discussion

Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status. This means that pictures from, for example, Flickr are ineligible unless the photographer is a Commons user. (Note that Featured Pictures do not have this requirement.) Photographical reproductions of two-dimensional works of art, made by Wikimedians, are eligible (and should be licensed PD-old according to the Commons guidelines). If an image is promoted despite not being the creation of a Wikimedian, the QI status should be removed as soon as the mistake is detected.

Requisitos técnicos

More detailed criteria are available at Commons:Image guidelines.

Resolución

Bitmapped images (JPEG, PNG, GIF, TIFF) should normally have at least 2 megapixels; reviewers may demand more for subjects that can be photographed easily. This is because images on Commons may be printed, viewed on monitors with very high resolution, or used in future media. This rule excludes vector graphics (SVG) or computer-generated images that have been constructed with freely-licensed or open software programs as noted in the image's description.

Calidade das imaxes

As imaxes dixitais poden ter varios problemas que se orixinan na captura e no procesamento das mesmas, como ruído, problemas coa compresión JPEG, falta de información en áreas de sombras ou altas luces, ou problemas coa captura de cores. Todos estes probemas deben ser tratados axeitadamente.

Composición e iluminación

A disposición do obxecto principal dentro da imaxe debe contribuír á mesma. Os obxectos da fronte o do fondo non deben desviar a atención. A iluminación e o enfoque tamén contribúen ao resultado xeral; o obxecto principal ten que estar nítido, despexado e ben exposto.

Valor

Our main goal is to encourage quality images being contributed to Wikicommons, valuable for Wikimedia and other projects.

Como nomear

Simply add a line of this form at the top of Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list Nominations section: 

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Descrición breve  --~~~~ |}}

The description shouldn't be more than a few words, and please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.

If you are nominating an image by another Wikimedian, include their username in the description as below: 

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description (by [[User:USERNAME|USERNAME]]) --~~~~ |}}

Note: there is a Gadget, QInominator, which makes nominations quicker. It adds a small "Nominate this image for QI" link at the top of every file page. Clicking the link adds the image to a list of potential candidates. When this list is completed, edit Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list. At the top of the edit window a green bar will be displayed. Clicking the bar inserts all potential candidates into the edit window.

Número de nomeamentos

No more than five images per day can be added by a single nominator.

Note: If possible, for every picture you nominate, please review at least one of the other candidates.

Avaliando as imaxes

Any registered user whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 constructive, stable edits on Commons (excluding user and talk pages), other than the author and the nominator, can review a nomination. For an easier evaluation you can activate the gadget QICvote

When evaluating images the reviewer should consider the same guidelines as the nominator.

Como revisar

Como actualizar o status

Carefully review the image. Open it in full resolution, and check if the quality criteria are met.

  • If you decide to promote the nomination, change the relevant line from
File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Descrición breve --~~~~ | }}

a

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Promotion|Descrición breve --Sinatura do nomeador |Porque che gustou. --~~~~}}

Noutras palabras, cambia o modelo de /Nomination a /Promotion e engade a túa sinatura, posiblemente con algún comentario curto.

  • Se decides rexeitar o nomeamento, cambia a liña relevante de
File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Descrición breve --~~~~ | }}

a

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Decline|Descrición breve --Sinatura do nomeador |Porque non che gustou. --~~~~}}

In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Decline and add your signature, possibly with a statement of the criteria under which the image failed (you can use titles of section from the guidelines). If there are many problems, please note only 2 or 3 of the most severe, or add multiple problems. When declining a nomination please do explain the reasons on the nominator’s talk page – as a rule, be nice and encouraging! In the message you should give a more detailed explanation of your decision.

Note: Please evaluate the oldest images first.

Good voting practices

Shortcut
  1. Do not have an image moved to consensual review ("Discuss") unless someone else added a vote with which you disagree.
  2. If you think the image meets QI criteria, use "Promotion" right away.
  3. If you think the image does not meet QI criteria and the issues cannot be solved, use "Decline" right away.
  4. If instead you believe that the issues can be solved, leave a comment without changing the status (keep it as Nomination).
  5. Do not add new votes under already promoted or declined images if you agree with the decision. The bot checks the date of the last comment, so this only delays the result.
  6. If a comment raises an unresolved issue, promoting is generally considered impolite. Only promote if the issue is clearly minor, fixed, or incorrect - and say so briefly. If you’re not sure, add a comment (don't change status). Change to "Discuss" only once conflicting votes appear.

Grace period and promotion

If there are no objections within a period of 2 days (exactly 48 hours) from the first review, the image becomes promoted or fails according to the review it received. If you have objection, just change its status to Discuss and it will be moved to the Consensual review section.

Como executar unha decisión

QICbot automatically handles this 2 days after a decision has been made, and promoted images are cached in Commons:Quality Images/Recently promoted awaiting categorization before their automatic insertion in to appropriate Quality images pages.

If you believe that you have identified an exceptional image that is worthy of Featured picture status then consider also nominating the image at Commons:Featured picture candidates.

Instrucións manuais (abrir só en casos de emerxencia)

If promoted,

  1. Add the image to appropriate group or groups of Quality images page. The image also needs to be added to the associated sub pages, only 3–4 of the newest images should be displayed on the main page.
  2. Add {{QualityImage}} template to the bottom of image description page.
  3. Move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives xuño 2026.
  4. Add the template {{File:imagename.jpg}} to the user’s talk page.

If declined,

  1. move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives xuño 2026.
  • Images awaiting review show the nomination outlined in blue.
  • Images the reviewer has accepted show the nomination outlined in green
  • Images the reviewer has rejected show the nomination outlined in red

Unassessed images (nomination outlined in blue)

Nominated images which have not generated assessments either to promote nor to decline, or a consensus (equal opposition as support in consensual review) after 8 days on this page should be removed from this page without promotion, archived in Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 02 2026 and Category:Unassessed QI candidates added to the image.

Consensual review process

Consensual review is a catch all place used in the case the procedure described above is insufficient and needs discussion for more opinions to emerge.

How to ask for consensual review

To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day.

Please only send things to consensual review that have been reviewed as promoted/declined. If, as a reviewer, you cannot make a decision, add your comments but leave the candidate on this page.

Consensual review rules

See Commons:Quality images candidates#Rules

Actualización da páxina: purge this page's cache

Nominations

Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures will only work on this page if you have JavaScript enabled. If you do not have JavaScript enabled please manually sign with: 

--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 01:18, 2 xuño 2026 (UTC)
  • Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC)
  • Please insert a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries
  • Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first; many are still unassessed
  • If you see terms with which you are unfamiliar, please see explanations at Photography terms

If you are not ready to Promote or Decline an image, you may leave a Comment instead.

If someone else has already promoted or declined an image and you disagree, you may cast an opposite voice or use Discuss — this will move the image to the Community Review section.

If you agree with a previous decision, there is no need to cast the same vote again, as doing so only delays the final closure of the nomination.

Please nominate no more than 5 images per day and try to review on average as many images as you nominate (check here to see how you are doing).


June 1, 2026

May 31, 2026

May 30, 2026

May 29, 2026

May 28, 2026

May 27, 2026

May 26, 2026

May 25, 2026

May 24, 2026

May 23, 2026

May 22, 2026

May 21, 2026

May 18, 2026

May 12, 2026

Consensual review

Rules

These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.

  • To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
  • You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
  • The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.
Using {{support}} or {{oppose}} will make it easier to count your vote.
Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted
  • In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
  • Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add  Oppose and  Support if necessary.
  • Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
  • Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".



File:Sikorskiego_square.,.,_Kraków,_Poland.jpg

Commons:Quality images candidates/gl/Discuss

File:Sikorskiego_square...,_Kraków,_Poland.jpg

Commons:Quality images candidates/gl/Discuss

File:Iglesia_de_San_Sulpicio,_París,_Francia,_2022-11-01,_DD_08-10_HDR.jpg

Commons:Quality images candidates/gl/Discuss

File:Collines_Parc_National_de_Bouhedma.jpg

Commons:Quality images candidates/gl/Discuss

File:Senden,_Dortmund-Ems-Kanal_(Alte_Fahrt)_--_2026_--_1311.jpg

Commons:Quality images candidates/gl/Discuss

File:Front_Saluki_Dog_Show_2026_Ooty_May26_A7CR_10809.jpg

Commons:Quality images candidates/gl/Discuss

File:Head_Right_Saluki_Dog_Show_2026_Ooty_May26_A7CR_10806.jpg

Commons:Quality images candidates/gl/Discuss

File:Belplasca.jpg

Commons:Quality images candidates/gl/Discuss

File:AC_SO_Rahmenprogramm_27._April_Reiner_Haseloff_I.jpg

Commons:Quality images candidates/gl/Discuss

File:The_Virgin_and_Child_with_St._Anne_by_Leonardo_da_Vinci.jpg

Commons:Quality images candidates/gl/Discuss

Táboa de tempo (8 días despois do nomeamento)

  • lun 25 maio → mar 02 xuñ
  • mar 26 maio → mér 03 xuñ
  • mér 27 maio → xov 04 xuñ
  • xov 28 maio → ven 05 xuñ
  • ven 29 maio → sáb 06 xuñ
  • sáb 30 maio → dom 07 xuñ
  • dom 31 maio → lun 08 xuñ
  • lun 01 xuñ → mar 09 xuñ
  • mar 02 xuñ → mér 10 xuñ
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Quality_images_candidates/gl&oldid=1157662079"